2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41430-019-0486-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic case for prevention of population vitamin D deficiency: a modelling study using data from England and Wales

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, it would be helpful if vitamin D deficiency, as currently defined for skeletal health, could be abolished in humans at the population level by measures independent of individual effort, such as the highly effective food fortification + self-supplementation programme in Finland ( 111 ). Fortification of flour plus free supplementation of high-risk groups, for example, has been proposed as a cost-effective way to abolish deficiency in the United Kingdom ( 112 ). With effective programmes to reduce skeletal health risks in place, future research could focus on other aspects of vitamin D’s role in human health such as establishing what further contributions improved vitamin D status may make to non-skeletal health, the correction of undesirable epigenetic effects of deficiency (especially in pregnancy where it may increase later health risks in offspring), the identification and correction of disadvantageous nutrient interactions and dealing with new problems that emerge as our understanding of the complexities of the vitamin D system increases.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, it would be helpful if vitamin D deficiency, as currently defined for skeletal health, could be abolished in humans at the population level by measures independent of individual effort, such as the highly effective food fortification + self-supplementation programme in Finland ( 111 ). Fortification of flour plus free supplementation of high-risk groups, for example, has been proposed as a cost-effective way to abolish deficiency in the United Kingdom ( 112 ). With effective programmes to reduce skeletal health risks in place, future research could focus on other aspects of vitamin D’s role in human health such as establishing what further contributions improved vitamin D status may make to non-skeletal health, the correction of undesirable epigenetic effects of deficiency (especially in pregnancy where it may increase later health risks in offspring), the identification and correction of disadvantageous nutrient interactions and dealing with new problems that emerge as our understanding of the complexities of the vitamin D system increases.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition of low vitamin D status has promoted research into safe and feasible vehicles for vitamin D fortification, including bread (Natri et al 2006). It has been estimated that fortification of wheat flour would be cost effective by preventing cases of vitamin D deficiency (Aguiar et al 2019) and there is some evidence that cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)‐fortified bread (made by adding a fortificant to dough) can improve vitamin D status (Natri et al 2006; Mocanu et al 2009; Nikooyeh et al 2016). Bread fortified with vitamin D made using irradiated baker’s yeast [an ingredient approved for safety as a novel food by EFSA (EFSA NDA Panel 2014b)] is available in the UK.…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the preparation of this paper, a cost–benefit analysis was published for vitamin D fortification of wheat flour, plus elective vitamin D supplementation for reducing vitamin D deficiency in England and Wales [156]. That analysis recommended fortifying wheat flour at 400 IU of vitamin D 3 per 100 g with an additional role for supplementing with 400 IU/day for the general population and at 800 IU/day for the elderly, on the basis of the recommendations for reducing falls and fragility fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%