1966
DOI: 10.2307/2693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ecology of Lough Ine. XV. The Ecological Significance of Shell and Body Forms in Nucella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
152
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
11
152
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This interaction of size increase and wave exposure is consistent with the increased risk of dislodgement of large N. lapillus at waveexposed sites (18)(19)(20)(21). This increase in shell length was unexpected, however, given the known influence of the recently introduced invasive C. maenas on N. lapillus shell morphology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). This interaction of size increase and wave exposure is consistent with the increased risk of dislodgement of large N. lapillus at waveexposed sites (18)(19)(20)(21). This increase in shell length was unexpected, however, given the known influence of the recently introduced invasive C. maenas on N. lapillus shell morphology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…These patterns have since led to the development of experimental analyses of crab-snail interactions as a model system for the study of inducible and evolved morphological defenses (13)(14)(15)(16). But although N. lapillus remains a common and extensively studied North Atlantic marine snail (17), no study has examined historical changes in its shell morphology on the scale of a century by exclusively resampling the same sites and evaluating site-specific wave exposures among sites, which alter shell size and shape (18)(19)(20)(21). With the goal of exploring spatial and temporal variations in N. lapillus shell morphology and their implications across a century of dramatic ecological change, we resampled snails at locations originally described in museum collections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kitching et al 1966 ;Crothers 1983). Field work (Burrows & Hughes 1989) and results of the present investigation, however, suggest that dogwhelks will tend to avoid exposure to this risk by taking refuge during rough weather.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…According to the neurological mechanism critical stimulus strength, inhibiting foraging behaviour would covary with morphology and hence with susceptibility to dislodgement. Critical stimulus strength thus would be less for sheltered-shore dogwhelks, whose relatively smaller pedal area affords lesser tenacity (Seed 1978 ;Etter 1988 b) and whose relatively more elongated shell presumably generates greater drag forces during wave surge (Kitching et al 1966 ;Newkirk & Doyle 1975 ;Denny 1988). Such behavioural differentiation among populations would be analogous to that recorded in the sexual behaviour of guppies living under different regimes of predation risk (Magurran et al 1992 ;see §1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation