Most buoyant marine plastics are either beached or afloat in coastal waters (Morales-Caselles et al., 2021;Onink et al., 2021). Beached macro-plastic can more easily degrade into smaller micro-plastics than floating or submerged plastics, for example, due to a higher exposure to solar UV radiation (Andrady, 2011) and mechanical fragmentation (Chubarenko et al., 2020). The importance of cleaning up our beaches is therefore evident (Kataoka & Hinata, 2015). However, it is difficult to do this efficiently when much is unknown about the source and fate of the plastic (Cózar et al., 2014; van Sebille, 2015). By locating and then mitigating at upstream sources (Robinson et al., 2017; van Gennip et al., 2019), it may be possible to prevent this pollution and its consequences. Moreover, knowing the sources of plastic pollution enables "naming and blaming" of the polluters.Source attribution of beached plastics has been done before by using Lagrangian simulations (van Sebille et al., 2018) to compute virtual particle trajectories back in time. For example, Neumann et al. (2014) analyzed the sources of plastic beaching on the German Wadden Island of Sylt and Juist to find that there was a seasonal cycle in possible source regions. Gutow et al. (2018) analyzed the difference in source regions in the North Sea to find that these are sensitive to offshore locations and wind drag coefficient. Strand et al. (2021) analyzed the sources of plastic in the Arctic and northeast Atlantic, focusing particularly on fisheries sources. However, none of these studies took into account information on the spatial patterns of plastic input. There are studies that have combined source input data and Lagrangian simulations