Abstract:Planarians are on the rise as a model system for regeneration and stem cell dynamics. Almost in parallel the interest in planarian field biology has declined. Besides representing an independent research discipline in its own right, understanding of the natural habitat is also directly relevant to optimizing culture conditions in the laboratory. Moreover, the current laboratory models are but few of hundreds of planarian species worldwide. Their adaptation to a wide range of ecological niches has resulted in a… Show more
“…While the sexualization mechanism in this case remains unknown, up-regulation of canonical Wnt pathway activity has been shown to both suppress regeneration and sexualize in other planarian species (Sikes and Newmark, 2013;Sureda-Gómez, Martín-Durán and Adell, 2016). On the basis of these results, Vila-Farré and Rink (2018) have suggested that Wnt pathway activity, which is known to be essential for the regeneration of posterior structures in planaria, may also serve as a switch between gametic and vegetative reproduction. As Wnt is a versatile, early-as well as late-acting regulator of both polarity and cell fate across multicellular animals, confirmation of a mechanistic link between Wnt activity, regeneration, and sexualization outside of the planaria would provide broader evidence for the competitive model proposed here.…”
Section: Germ and Non-germ Lineages Compete For "Spheres Of Influence"mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If non-germline stem cells "win" and suppress germline development, obligate vegetative asexuals that altogether lack specialized germline stem cells, gametes, or gonads, such as the laboratory model planaria Dugesia japonica or Schmidtea mediterranea can be expected. Population variants or close relatives of both of these species are sexual, suggesting that full suppression of germline development is not stable over evolutionary timescales (Sluys and Riutort, 2018;Vila-Farré and Rink, 2018). If, on the other hand, germline stem cells "win" and suppress totipotency in non-germline stem cells, obligate gametic reproducers incapable of WBR can be expected.…”
Section: How Does This Repression Happen?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperation enables sex and hence a new genotype for which lethality is lower, and the cycle repeats itself. Such cyclic sexuality occurs in planaria (Sluys and Riutort, 2018;Vila-Farré and Rink, 2018), though single populations that alternate between sexual and asexual (vegetative) reproduction appear to be rare. Fig.…”
Section: Germ and Non-germ Lineages Compete For "Spheres Of Influence"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many animals, sex is optional. Placozoa (Miller and Ball, 2005), sponges (Ereskovsky, Renard and Borchiellini, 2013), ctenophores (Martindale, 2016), cnidarians (Fautin, 2002), basal bilaterians including acoels (Bouriat and Hejnol, 2009), various invertebrates including flatworms (Rink, 2018) and annelids (Zattara and Bely, 2016), and even basal chordates, the colonial ascidians (Kürn et al, 2011) provide examples of vegetative (i.e. agametic) reproduction by budding, fission, or fragmentation accompanied by whole-body regeneration (WBR) in species that are also sexually competent (see Slack, 2017;Lai and Aboobaker, 2018;Subramoniam, 2018 for comparative analysis).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Lai and Aboobaker (2018) point out, WBR strongly correlates with the presence of non-germline stem cells expressing components of the hypothesized germline multipotency program (GMP; Juliano, Swartz and Wessel, 2010), including the PIWI/piRNA transposon repression system (Ross, Weiner and Lin, 2014;Czech et al, 2018), vasa (Gustafson and Wessel, 2010), nanos (De Keuckelaere et al, 2018), tudor (Pek, Anand and Kai, 2012), and other typically germline regulators. At least in flatworms (Sluys and Riutort, 2018) and annelids (Zattara and Bely, 2016), vegetative reproduction also requires specific behaviors (e.g. to induce fission) that can be lost separately.…”
Animals that can reproduce vegetatively by fission or budding and also sexually via specialized gametes are found in all five primary animal lineages (Bilateria, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Porifera). Many bilaterian lineages, including roundworms, insects, and most chordates, have lost the capability of vegetative reproduction and are obligately gametic. We suggest a developmental explanation for this evolutionary phenomenon: obligate gametic reproduction is the result of germline stem cells winning a winner-take-all competition with non-germline stem cells for control of reproduction and hence lineage survival. We develop this suggestion by extending Hamilton's rule, which factors the relatedness between parties into the cost/benefit analysis that underpins cooperative behaviors, to include similarity of cellular state. We show how coercive or deceptive cell-cell signaling can be used to make costly cooperative behaviors appear less costly to the cooperating party. We then show how competition between stem-cell lineages can render an ancestral combination of vegetative reproduction with facultative sex unstable, with one or the other process driven to extinction. The increased susceptibility to cancer observed in obligately-sexual lineages is, we suggest, a side-effect of deceptive signaling that is exacerbated by the loss of whole-body regenerative abilities. We suggest a variety of experimental approaches for testing our predictions.
“…While the sexualization mechanism in this case remains unknown, up-regulation of canonical Wnt pathway activity has been shown to both suppress regeneration and sexualize in other planarian species (Sikes and Newmark, 2013;Sureda-Gómez, Martín-Durán and Adell, 2016). On the basis of these results, Vila-Farré and Rink (2018) have suggested that Wnt pathway activity, which is known to be essential for the regeneration of posterior structures in planaria, may also serve as a switch between gametic and vegetative reproduction. As Wnt is a versatile, early-as well as late-acting regulator of both polarity and cell fate across multicellular animals, confirmation of a mechanistic link between Wnt activity, regeneration, and sexualization outside of the planaria would provide broader evidence for the competitive model proposed here.…”
Section: Germ and Non-germ Lineages Compete For "Spheres Of Influence"mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If non-germline stem cells "win" and suppress germline development, obligate vegetative asexuals that altogether lack specialized germline stem cells, gametes, or gonads, such as the laboratory model planaria Dugesia japonica or Schmidtea mediterranea can be expected. Population variants or close relatives of both of these species are sexual, suggesting that full suppression of germline development is not stable over evolutionary timescales (Sluys and Riutort, 2018;Vila-Farré and Rink, 2018). If, on the other hand, germline stem cells "win" and suppress totipotency in non-germline stem cells, obligate gametic reproducers incapable of WBR can be expected.…”
Section: How Does This Repression Happen?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperation enables sex and hence a new genotype for which lethality is lower, and the cycle repeats itself. Such cyclic sexuality occurs in planaria (Sluys and Riutort, 2018;Vila-Farré and Rink, 2018), though single populations that alternate between sexual and asexual (vegetative) reproduction appear to be rare. Fig.…”
Section: Germ and Non-germ Lineages Compete For "Spheres Of Influence"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many animals, sex is optional. Placozoa (Miller and Ball, 2005), sponges (Ereskovsky, Renard and Borchiellini, 2013), ctenophores (Martindale, 2016), cnidarians (Fautin, 2002), basal bilaterians including acoels (Bouriat and Hejnol, 2009), various invertebrates including flatworms (Rink, 2018) and annelids (Zattara and Bely, 2016), and even basal chordates, the colonial ascidians (Kürn et al, 2011) provide examples of vegetative (i.e. agametic) reproduction by budding, fission, or fragmentation accompanied by whole-body regeneration (WBR) in species that are also sexually competent (see Slack, 2017;Lai and Aboobaker, 2018;Subramoniam, 2018 for comparative analysis).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Lai and Aboobaker (2018) point out, WBR strongly correlates with the presence of non-germline stem cells expressing components of the hypothesized germline multipotency program (GMP; Juliano, Swartz and Wessel, 2010), including the PIWI/piRNA transposon repression system (Ross, Weiner and Lin, 2014;Czech et al, 2018), vasa (Gustafson and Wessel, 2010), nanos (De Keuckelaere et al, 2018), tudor (Pek, Anand and Kai, 2012), and other typically germline regulators. At least in flatworms (Sluys and Riutort, 2018) and annelids (Zattara and Bely, 2016), vegetative reproduction also requires specific behaviors (e.g. to induce fission) that can be lost separately.…”
Animals that can reproduce vegetatively by fission or budding and also sexually via specialized gametes are found in all five primary animal lineages (Bilateria, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Porifera). Many bilaterian lineages, including roundworms, insects, and most chordates, have lost the capability of vegetative reproduction and are obligately gametic. We suggest a developmental explanation for this evolutionary phenomenon: obligate gametic reproduction is the result of germline stem cells winning a winner-take-all competition with non-germline stem cells for control of reproduction and hence lineage survival. We develop this suggestion by extending Hamilton's rule, which factors the relatedness between parties into the cost/benefit analysis that underpins cooperative behaviors, to include similarity of cellular state. We show how coercive or deceptive cell-cell signaling can be used to make costly cooperative behaviors appear less costly to the cooperating party. We then show how competition between stem-cell lineages can render an ancestral combination of vegetative reproduction with facultative sex unstable, with one or the other process driven to extinction. The increased susceptibility to cancer observed in obligately-sexual lineages is, we suggest, a side-effect of deceptive signaling that is exacerbated by the loss of whole-body regenerative abilities. We suggest a variety of experimental approaches for testing our predictions.
Background: Planarian flatworms are popular invertebrate models for basic research on stem cell biology and regeneration. These animals are commonly maintained on a diet of homogenized calf liver or boiled egg yolk in the laboratory, introducing a source of uncontrolled experimental variability.Results: Here, we report the development of defined diets, prepared entirely from standardized, commercially sourced ingredients, for the freshwater species Schmidtea mediterranea, Dugesia japonica, and Girardia dorotocephala. These food sources provide an opportunity to test the effects of specific nutritional variables on biological phenomena of interest. Defined diet consumption was not sufficient for growth and only partially induced the increase in stem cell division that normally accompanies feeding, suggesting these responses are not solely determined by caloric intake. Our defined diet formulations enable delivery of double-stranded RNA for gene knockdown in a manner that provides unique advantages in some experimental contexts. We also present a new approach for preserving tissue integrity during hydrogen peroxide bleaching of liver-fed animals.Conclusions: These tools will empower research on the connections between diet, metabolism, and stem cell biology in the experimentally tractable planarian system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.