2006
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyl249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eco- in eco-epidemiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As with our bird study, proper controlled experiments on humans regarding effects of unhealthy diet or smoking are considered unethical and cannot be done. Epidemiology has long recognized the weakness of the correlative nature of its investigations for identifying the biological and behavioural causes of disease (Galea et al 2010;Hill 1965;March and Susser 2006). Still, it is possible to discover cause-effect relationships from purely observational data (Pearl and Verma 1991).…”
Section: Understanding Causality: a Comparison With Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with our bird study, proper controlled experiments on humans regarding effects of unhealthy diet or smoking are considered unethical and cannot be done. Epidemiology has long recognized the weakness of the correlative nature of its investigations for identifying the biological and behavioural causes of disease (Galea et al 2010;Hill 1965;March and Susser 2006). Still, it is possible to discover cause-effect relationships from purely observational data (Pearl and Verma 1991).…”
Section: Understanding Causality: a Comparison With Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clearly presents new challenges not only to current epidemiological methods regarding disease causation, but also to the type of approaches required to reliably investigate climate-health relationships (Baker and Nieuwenhuijsen 2008;March and Susser 2006;McMichael 1999;Pekkanen and Pearce 2001). Here, our aim is to review some key challenges that climate change presents to epidemiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Différentes approches sont nécessaires pour identifier à chacun de ces niveaux, les processus causals et examiner comment un processus à un niveau (moléculaire ou social) pourrait se manifester à un autre niveau (maladie chez un individu) [33]. Comme science de la santé publique, l'épidémiologie a la lourde tâche de continuer à intégrer les résultats des recherches qui sont menées par des disciplines parfois concurrentes, à la fois biologiques et sociales [34], afin de mettre en place des actions de prévention les plus efficaces possibles face aux problèmes globaux de santé. ‡ SUMMARY Eco-epidemiology: towards epidemiology of complexity In order to solve public health problems posed by the epidemiology of risk factors centered on the individual and neglecting the causal processes linking the risk factors with the health outcomes, Mervyn Susser proposed a multilevel epidemiology called eco-epidemiology, addressing the interdependence of individuals and their connection with molecular, individual, societal, environmental levels of organization participating in the causal disease processes.…”
Section: Développement De L'éco-épidémiologieunclassified