2022
DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.206.77379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ECAT dataset: expert-validated distribution data of endemic and sub-endemic trees of Central Africa (Dem. Rep. Congo, Rwanda, Burundi)

Abstract: In this data paper, we present a specimen-based occurrence dataset compiled in the framework of the Conservation of Endemic Central African Trees (ECAT) project with the aim of producing global conservation assessments for the IUCN Red List. The project targets all tree species endemic or sub-endemic to the Central African region comprising the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), Rwanda, and Burundi. The dataset contains 6361 plant collection records with occurrences of 8910 specimens from 337 taxa be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the records where countries did not match, I retained all records where the countries matched for the NE 1:10 m layer (https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-cultural-vectors/; version 5.1.1 downloaded in November 2022). By using the small‐scale layer first, I allowed for some buffers around country boundaries, but such buffers can be considered acceptable given the spatial precision of country GIS layers and locality data (Tack et al, 2022). The NE 1:10 million layer did not show the distribution of certain GBIF country codes as for example ‘GF’ (French Guyana, with corresponding occurrences mainly mapped by NE in the multipolygon with the country code of ‘FRA’, indicating France) or ‘BQ’ (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, corresponding in NE to The Netherlands).…”
Section: Compiling the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the records where countries did not match, I retained all records where the countries matched for the NE 1:10 m layer (https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-cultural-vectors/; version 5.1.1 downloaded in November 2022). By using the small‐scale layer first, I allowed for some buffers around country boundaries, but such buffers can be considered acceptable given the spatial precision of country GIS layers and locality data (Tack et al, 2022). The NE 1:10 million layer did not show the distribution of certain GBIF country codes as for example ‘GF’ (French Guyana, with corresponding occurrences mainly mapped by NE in the multipolygon with the country code of ‘FRA’, indicating France) or ‘BQ’ (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, corresponding in NE to The Netherlands).…”
Section: Compiling the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…natur alear thdata.com/downl oads/10m-cultu ral-vecto rs/; version 5.1.1 downloaded in November 2022). By using the small-scale layer first, I allowed for some buffers around country boundaries, but such buffers can be considered acceptable given the spatial precision of country GIS layers and locality data (Tack et al, 2022).…”
Section: Presence Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the records where countries did not match, I retained all records where the countries matched for the NE 1:10m layer (https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10mcultural-vectors/; version 5.1.1 downloaded in November 2022). By using the small scale layer first, I allowed for some buffers around country boundaries, but such buffers can be considered acceptable given the spatial precision of country GIS layers and locality data (Tack et al, 2022). The NE 1:10 million layer did not show the distribution of certain GBIF country codes as for example 'GF' (French Guyana, with corresponding occurrences mainly mapped by NE in the multipolygon with the country code of 'FRA', indicating France) or 'BQ' (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, corresponding in NE to The Netherlands).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%