2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Eating and Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress (EADES) Questionnaire: Development and Validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
32
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The association between emotional eating and BMI found in the present study is consistent with previous investigations, where the Emotion-and Stress-Related Eating questionnaire (EADES) was applied in nonclinical populations (Lazarevich et al, 2015;Ozier et al, 2007). Furthermore, applying different instruments to measure emotional eating, a number of studies also revealed an association between overeating in response to negative emotions and weight gain (Bennett et al, 2013;Garaulet et al, 2012;Greene et al, 2011;Laitinen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The association between emotional eating and BMI found in the present study is consistent with previous investigations, where the Emotion-and Stress-Related Eating questionnaire (EADES) was applied in nonclinical populations (Lazarevich et al, 2015;Ozier et al, 2007). Furthermore, applying different instruments to measure emotional eating, a number of studies also revealed an association between overeating in response to negative emotions and weight gain (Bennett et al, 2013;Garaulet et al, 2012;Greene et al, 2011;Laitinen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Individuals responded to the questionnaire in accordance with their level of agreement from strongly agree to strongly disagree, on a scale of 1e5. According to the original questionnaire, the lower the score, the more compromised is eating behavior (Ozier et al, 2007).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument variance explained by the 6 scales (64%) was similar to that reported for other instruments. [29][30][31][32] The scales had good internal reliability. Internal consistency for all of the BECS scales ranged from adequate to excellent, similar to other findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setiap pernyataan akan dinilai 1 hingga 6 dengan penjelasan tidak pernah hingga selalu. Pengukuran asosiasi emosional responden menggunakan kuesioner yang diadopsi dari Ozier, et al (2007) …”
Section: Metodeunclassified