1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199704)53:3<279::aid-jclp11>3.3.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The early relationship of drug abusing mothers and their infants: An assessment at eight to twelve months of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, with only gestational age and sex as covariates, we did find a group difference in one of our social-emotional measures (dyadic interaction): Exposed toddlers and their caregivers were less emotionally expressive and responsive to each other during a feeding episode. Although this finding is similar to those observed by others during separation and reunion episodes (Beeghly et al, 2003;Burns, Chethik, Burns, & Clark, 1997;Molitor, Mayes, & Ward, 2003;Ukeje, Bendersky, & Lewis, 2001), this effect no longer achieved a conventional level of statistical significance when caregiver characteristics and the caregiving environment were taken into account. Thus, we return to a point we made earlier: To evaluate child outcome, type of care needs to be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, with only gestational age and sex as covariates, we did find a group difference in one of our social-emotional measures (dyadic interaction): Exposed toddlers and their caregivers were less emotionally expressive and responsive to each other during a feeding episode. Although this finding is similar to those observed by others during separation and reunion episodes (Beeghly et al, 2003;Burns, Chethik, Burns, & Clark, 1997;Molitor, Mayes, & Ward, 2003;Ukeje, Bendersky, & Lewis, 2001), this effect no longer achieved a conventional level of statistical significance when caregiver characteristics and the caregiving environment were taken into account. Thus, we return to a point we made earlier: To evaluate child outcome, type of care needs to be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As a group, drug-dependent mothers fare worse than non drug-dependent mothers on a wide range of parenting indices and more frequently lose their children to foster care than non drug-dependent mothers (Chaffin, Kelleher, and Hollenberg, 1996;Mayes & Bornstein, 1996). Observations of mother-infant dyads have shown patterns of mothersT poor sensitivity and responsiveness to childrenTs emotional cues juxtaposed with heightened physical activity, provocation, and intrusiveness (Burns, Chethik, Burns, & Clark, 1997;Hans, Bernstein, & Henson, 1999;Rodning, Beckwith, & Howard, 1991). Studies reporting perspectives of substance-abusing mothers about parenting have indicated a lack of understanding about basic child development issues, ambivalent feelings about having and keeping children, and lower capacities to reflect upon their childrenTs emotional and cognitive experience (Levy, Truman, & Mayes, 2001;Mayes & Truman, 2002;Murphy & Rosenbaum, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such pathway may be through problematic mother-infant interactions. Cocaine using mothers are more disengaged and passive during mother-infant interactions in the neonatal period [31], are less flexible and engaged during feeding interactions [40], have lower responsiveness and enthusiasm in later infancy [11,12], are less emotionally engaged in the toddler period [50], use fewer positive reinforcements and more threats of physical discipline in the toddler/preschool period [2], and are more hostile and intrusive in a structured teaching situation at 3 years of age [37]. The animal literature is supportive of these results indicating dose-dependent associations between cocaine treatment during gestation and disruptions in maternal caretaking behavior in the immediate post-partum period [52, 61, 66], perhaps due to decreased oxytocin levels [34,35,36,44,49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%