The eardrums move when the eyes move: A multisensory effect on the mechanics of hearing

Abstract

Interactions between sensory pathways such as the visual and auditory systems are known to occur in the brain, but where they first occur is uncertain. Here, we show a multimodal interaction evident at the eardrum. Ear canal microphone measurements in humans (n = 19 ears in 16 subjects) and monkeys (n = 5 ears in three subjects) performing a saccadic eye movement task to visual targets indicated that the eardrum moves in conjunction with the eye movement. The eardrum motion was oscillatory and began as early as 10 ms before saccade onset in humans or with saccade onset in monkeys. These eardrum movements, which we dub eye movement-related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs), occurred in the absence of a sound stimulus. The amplitude and phase of the EMREOs depended on the direction and horizontal amplitude of the saccade. They lasted throughout the saccade and well into subsequent periods of steady fixation. We discuss the possibility that the mechanisms underlying EMREOs create eye movement-related binaural cues that may aid the brain in evaluating the relationship between visual and auditory stimulus locations as the eyes move.reference frame | otoacoustic emissions | middle ear muscles | saccade | EMREO V isual information can aid hearing, such as when lip reading cues facilitate speech comprehension. To derive such benefits, the brain must first link visual and auditory signals that arise from common locations in space. In species with mobile eyes (e.g., humans, monkeys), visual and auditory spatial cues bear no fixed relationship to one another but change dramatically and frequently as the eyes move, about three times per second over an 80°range of space. Accordingly, considerable effort has been devoted to determining where and how the brain incorporates information about eye movements into the visual and auditory processing streams (1). In the primate brain, all of the regions previously evaluated have shown some evidence that eye movements modulate auditory processing [inferior colliculus (2-6), auditory cortex (7-9), parietal cortex (10-12), and superior colliculus (13-17)]. Such findings raise the question of where in the auditory pathway eye movements first impact auditory processing. In this study, we tested whether eye movements affect processing in the auditory periphery.The auditory periphery possesses at least two means of tailoring its processing in response to descending neural control (Fig. 1). First, the middle ear muscles (MEMs), the stapedius and tensor tympani, attach to the ossicles that connect the eardrum to the oval window of the cochlea. Contraction of these muscles tugs on the ossicular chain, modulating middle ear sound transmission and moving the eardrum. Second, within the cochlea, the outer hair cells (OHCs) are mechanically active and modify the motion of both the basilar membrane and, through mechanical coupling via the ossicles, the eardrum [i.e., otoacoustic emissions (OAEs)]. In short, the actions of the MEMs and OHCs affect not only the response to incoming sound but also transmi...

Auditory attention reduced ear-canal noise in humans, but not through medial olivocochlear efferent inhibition: Implications for measuring otoacoustic emissions during behavioral task performance

“…While we did not find that attention changed ear-canal noise through MOC inhibition, we did find 502 that the decrease in ear-canal noise was a very robust indicator of whether subjects were or were not Recently, Gruters et al (2018) found an interaction between saccadic eye movement and changes in 511 ear-canal sound pressure that lasted for 10's of milliseconds. The infrasounds produced by such eye 512 movements would have been filtered out in our measurements, but they do point out that there are 513 many subject motion changes that may affect ear-canal noise.…”

Evidence for a system in the auditory periphery that may contribute to linking sounds and images in space

“…Using the three-origin horizontal slice task, we first replicated our original findings by analyzing only the trials that used similar targets as previously published work [30].…”

“…Thus, the brain has the opportunity to tailor how ascending sensory signals are first encoded, and potentially adjust ascending auditory signals to facilitate linking to the visual system at later stages. movement-related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs) are a recently discovered phenomenon in which the eardrum oscillates, time-locked to both saccade onset and offset, in the absence of incoming sound [30]. These oscillations likely reflect descending eye movement-related neural commands that influence the ears' internal motor elements -the middle ear muscles, outer hair cells, or some combinationin a still unknown fashion.…”

The role of motor and environmental visual rhythms in structuring auditory cortical excitability

“…Besides anatomical studies, recent magnetoencephalography studies investigating predictions in auditory scenes in humans found significant effective connectivity from motor cortex toward auditory areas (Abbasi and Gross, 2020;Morillon and Baillet, 2017). Additionally, besides direct projections, an indirect source of motor influences on the auditory system could stem from the cochlea, as a recent study reported oscillations of the eardrum coinciding with saccade onset in the absence of sound (Gruters et al, 2018). The authors hypothesized that the eardrum movement is due to a copy of the motor command that generates saccades.…”