1992
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(92)90116-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The E-region Rocket/Radar Instability Study (ERRRIS): scientific objectives and campaign overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, the increase in T e is expected to be minute, but for the somewhat larger down-leg fields, E 0 ≈60-70 mV/m, nontrivial enhancements of T e are anticipated, but not observed for the present conditions. The wave propagation velocities, for instance, as found by Iranpour et al (1997), Krane et al (2000) and Dyrud et al (2006) are best explained by an electron temperature of approximately 400 K. Also other reports (Pfaff et al, 1992) noted the lack of electron temperature enhancements for conditions similar to ours. A previous study (Dyrud et al, 2006) attempted to explain the low electron temperatures by thermal conduction to the colder regions below the enhanced wave activity, but used too low numerical values for the electron energy loss per collision, by taking this energy loss to be at most an order of magnitude larger than for inelastic collisions.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…4, the increase in T e is expected to be minute, but for the somewhat larger down-leg fields, E 0 ≈60-70 mV/m, nontrivial enhancements of T e are anticipated, but not observed for the present conditions. The wave propagation velocities, for instance, as found by Iranpour et al (1997), Krane et al (2000) and Dyrud et al (2006) are best explained by an electron temperature of approximately 400 K. Also other reports (Pfaff et al, 1992) noted the lack of electron temperature enhancements for conditions similar to ours. A previous study (Dyrud et al, 2006) attempted to explain the low electron temperatures by thermal conduction to the colder regions below the enhanced wave activity, but used too low numerical values for the electron energy loss per collision, by taking this energy loss to be at most an order of magnitude larger than for inelastic collisions.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The STARE radar measurements were made in the same flux tube as EISCAT, as determined by the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model. The time resolution of the EISCAT observations was 180 s. The joint radar measurements used in this paper were obtained during the E Region Rocket/Radar Instability Study (ERRRIS) campaign[ Williams et al , 1990; Pfaff et al , 1992].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pfa et al, 1992), as if two distinct plasma regimes were present. If so, it would be surprising to ®nd that the wave heating rates would not change at least a little in the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%