2000
DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4303.796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dysphonia Severity Index

Abstract: The vocal quality of a patient is modeled by means of a Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), which is designed to establish an objective and quantitative correlate of the perceived vocal quality. The DSI is based on the weighted combination of the following selected set of voice measurements: highest frequency (F(0)-High in Hz), lowest intensity (I-Low in dB), maximum phonation time (MPT in s), and jitter (%). The DSI is derived from a multivariate analysis of 387 subjects with the goal of describing, purely based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 475 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
65
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…• The DSI was calculated using the following equation: DSI = 0.13 × MPT + 0.0053 × F₀-high - 0.26 × I-low - 1.18 × jitter (%) + 12.4 [10]. The parameters used for the DSI are maximum phonation time (MPT, in seconds), the highest frequency (F₀-high, in Hz), the lowest intensity (I-low, in dB SPL), and jitter (in %).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The DSI was calculated using the following equation: DSI = 0.13 × MPT + 0.0053 × F₀-high - 0.26 × I-low - 1.18 × jitter (%) + 12.4 [10]. The parameters used for the DSI are maximum phonation time (MPT, in seconds), the highest frequency (F₀-high, in Hz), the lowest intensity (I-low, in dB SPL), and jitter (in %).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSI quantitatively measures acoustic parameters, such as maximum phonation time, jitter, maximum frequency and minimum intensity that determine vocal quality, and by means of a normalized formula, a score is reported as the general status of the vocal quality (11). As commonly accepted, evaluating several parameters is more reliable than evaluating only one parameter, such as fundamental frequency, shimmer, or jitter (11,12). This index has two versions of alpha and beta (11,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As commonly accepted, evaluating several parameters is more reliable than evaluating only one parameter, such as fundamental frequency, shimmer, or jitter (11,12). This index has two versions of alpha and beta (11,13). The alpha version was designed in 2000 by Wuyts and colleagues; in this version, the examiner requires a software such as multi-dimensional voice program and voice range profile to execute and calculate each parameter (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited U n c o r r e c t e d P r o o f quality, and one of these is the "dysphonia severity index" (DSI). The ability to perform a multi-parametric evaluation has altered this index to one of the most valuable clinical tools for quantitatively describing voice disorders (9). The results of the index vary between +5 (for a perfect and perceptually normal voice without dysphonia) and -5 (for a severe dysphonia).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%