2015
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-110813-032156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dysfunctional Congress

Abstract: Is the US Congress dysfunctional? The American public thinks so: In the summer of 2014, just 7% approved strongly of Congress (Riffkin 2014). Still, legislative scholars disagree about the severity of Congress's legislative challenges. Is legislative deadlock a sign that Congress can no longer identify and resolve major public problems? Or are Congress's difficulties temporary and correctable? In this article, I review theoretical and empirical literatures on the dynamics of lawmaking and evaluate alternative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, while the US Congress is often criticized as gridlocked and paralyzed (e.g. Binder , ; Chiou & Rothenberg ; cf. Chafetz ; Teter ), the Israeli Knesset is often criticized for the opposite problem: hyperactive legislation (Chazan ; Friedberg ; Bar‐Siman‐Tov ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, while the US Congress is often criticized as gridlocked and paralyzed (e.g. Binder , ; Chiou & Rothenberg ; cf. Chafetz ; Teter ), the Israeli Knesset is often criticized for the opposite problem: hyperactive legislation (Chazan ; Friedberg ; Bar‐Siman‐Tov ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-establishment politics are not new (Horwitz, 2013;Barr, 2009) and can currently be observed both in the conservative right with the Tea Party members (Boykoff and Laschever, 2011;Skocpol and Williamson, 2012), as well as in the liberal left (Bolton, 2016). However, members of Congress become institutionalized and their behaviour is shaped by their institution (Binder, 2015;Hibbing and Theiss-Morse, 1995;Canon, 1989) even as they campaign as outsiders (Herrnson, 2007;Burden, 2004). The literature provides evidence that members become more alike the more time they spend in the institution (Cox and McCubbins, 2005) and that general election competition exerts pressure towards convergence (Hirano et al, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet these strategies have not produced consistent majoritarian results. Strong partisanship in the House has not been matched by party unity, and in the Senate, the tradition of individualism, while weakened, is still influential (Binder ).…”
Section: Insurmountable?mentioning
confidence: 99%