The dynamics of the transnational food chain regulatory governance

Abstract

Purpose -The need for food safety and food quality standards is acknowledged by public regulators, private actors, and the society. The purpose of this paper is to identify the types of actors in the multilevel transnational food chain regulatory governance and how their interlinking affects regulatory outcomes over time. Design/methodology/approach -Food chain regulatory standards emerge within a complex process beyond the state. Based on interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives, namely regulatory governance and political economy, this paper provides a integrative framework of analysis by identifying the types of actors and their interactions in the food chain regulatory governance. Findings -Food chain regulatory standards setting have been mainly studied either from the public regulator or the firm self-regulating point of view. This paper demonstrates how the political and economics dynamics of the interactions among public and private actors operate within the transnational food standards setting process. The study identifies the groups of interdependent actors (public and private) that interact within the transnational food chain regulatory process and develop public-private regulations, self-regulations, and co-regulations over time. In this process, the actors' different power, operational and regulatory capacity, experience, resources affect the regulatory outcome with socio-economic and governance implications.Research limitations/implications -The paper does not examine in detail how these interactions operate empirically on specific regulations. Practical implications -The paper offers an integrative thorough understanding of the food chain regulatory standard setting process, relevant for academics, policy makers, the industry, and society. Originality/value -The paper constitutes new research by identifying the actors and interactions in the integrative regulatory governance of the food chain standards.

Global supermarkets’ corporate social responsibility commitments to public health: a content analysis

“…This analysis focused on CSR commitments related to food and non-alcoholic beverages in the three domains of food governance, the food system, and public health nutrition. Food governance CSR commitments describe rules or decisions that impact the food system [ 49 ]. Food system CSR commitments impact the people whose livelihoods depend upon making food available, including farmers and food manufacturers, and their communities [ 50 ].…”

Review of the food processing supply chain literature: a UK, India bilateral context

“…A set of actors involved in the food supply chains, regulatory systems and global market constitute a flexible framework which needs to be managed to enhance competitiveness at the country level (Sagheer et al, 2009a, b). These actors interact within the regulatory environment of the food supply chain and develop public-private regulations, self-regulations and co-regulations (Chatzopoulou, 2015). In the UK context, food processors highlight consumer sovereignty and caveat venditor as positive elements of their company's ethical stance; however, regulators reveal the presence of coercive practices which disregard the interests of the consumer (Robson and Rawnsley, 2001).…”

What are the position and power of supermarkets in the Australian food system, and the implications for public health? A systematic scoping review

“…The power of food companies, including supermarkets, has been explored in terms of food governance , and using a taxonomy of corporate political activity . The term ‘food governance’ is used to describe how rules or decisions within the food system are made, and by whom . Clapp and Fuchs developed a conceptual framework to describe the different sources of power available to food companies including supermarkets for governance of the food system .…”