2002
DOI: 10.1002/1439-7641(20020415)3:4<320::aid-cphc320>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of the H+H2O Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For an overview of previous experimental and theoretical results, we refer to reviews. 23,24 In this article we present reaction rate constants of the title reaction down to 100 K using instanton theory [25][26][27][28][29] and down to 50 K using CVT/µOMT. 30,31 Instanton theory [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] is a semiclassical theory based on Feynman's path integrals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an overview of previous experimental and theoretical results, we refer to reviews. 23,24 In this article we present reaction rate constants of the title reaction down to 100 K using instanton theory [25][26][27][28][29] and down to 50 K using CVT/µOMT. 30,31 Instanton theory [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] is a semiclassical theory based on Feynman's path integrals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, several groups have developed surfaces for this reaction using different approaches, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] with there being two recent comparative reviews. 9,10 In general, all the surfaces agree closely on the structures of the stationary points, with the barrier height in the narrow range 5.5-6.2 kcal mol À1 , and the largest difference being in the saddle point imaginary frequency ranging from 1102 to 1655 cm À1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although the present work is not an analysis of the different PESs developed for this system, which can be found elsewhere, 9,10 at this point it can be interesting to analyze another important dynamics property in relation with the quality of the surface, namely, the integral cross section. For the OC surface used in this work, Pogrebnya et al 14 performed QCT and reduced-and full-dimensional QM calculations at different collision energies, finding that the QCT results follow the quantum curves well except for low collision energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In the present work, while the R 22 (1) transition probes OD in the JЈϭ1/2 level, and is therefore sensitive only to the laboratory ͑LAB͒ speed distribution and the LAB translational anisotropy of the reaction products, 82-84 the P 11 (1) transition is also sensitive, in principle, to the angular momentum polarization of the JЈϭ3/2 products. 24 In the present work, while the R 22 (1) transition probes OD in the JЈϭ1/2 level, and is therefore sensitive only to the laboratory ͑LAB͒ speed distribution and the LAB translational anisotropy of the reaction products, 82-84 the P 11 (1) transition is also sensitive, in principle, to the angular momentum polarization of the JЈϭ3/2 products.…”
Section: B Doppler-resolved Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%