2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112001006012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of strong turbulence at free surfaces. Part 1. Description

Abstract: A free surface may be deformed by fluid motions; such deformation may lead to surface roughness, breakup, or disintegration. This paper describes the wide range of free-surface deformations that occur when there is turbulence at the surface, and focuses on turbulence in the denser, liquid, medium. This turbulence may be generated at the surface as in breaking water waves, or may reach the surface from other sources such as bed boundary layers or submerged jets. The discussion is structured by considerati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
142
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further links were developed between breaking waves and steady flow configurations. These encompassed comparisons between plunging breakers and plunging jets (Cipriano and Blanchard 1981, Hubbard et al 1987, Chanson and Cumming 1994, Oguz et al 1995, Chanson et al 2002, Salter et al 2014, between spilling breakers and stationary hydraulic jumps (Longuet-Higgins 1973, Peregrine and Svendsen 1978, Madsen 1981, Brocchini et al 2001a, and between spilling breakers and translating hydraulic jumps (also called positive surges or tidal bores) (Longuet-Higgins 1973, Peregrine and Svendsen 1978, Brocchini and Peregrine 2001b. In parallel, there have been numerous discussions about the similarities and differences between stationary and translating hydraulic jumps (e.g.…”
Section: Flow Analogies or Not?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further links were developed between breaking waves and steady flow configurations. These encompassed comparisons between plunging breakers and plunging jets (Cipriano and Blanchard 1981, Hubbard et al 1987, Chanson and Cumming 1994, Oguz et al 1995, Chanson et al 2002, Salter et al 2014, between spilling breakers and stationary hydraulic jumps (Longuet-Higgins 1973, Peregrine and Svendsen 1978, Madsen 1981, Brocchini et al 2001a, and between spilling breakers and translating hydraulic jumps (also called positive surges or tidal bores) (Longuet-Higgins 1973, Peregrine and Svendsen 1978, Brocchini and Peregrine 2001b. In parallel, there have been numerous discussions about the similarities and differences between stationary and translating hydraulic jumps (e.g.…”
Section: Flow Analogies or Not?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is acknowledged that such scars are linked with some discontinuity in turbulence characteristics and physiochemical properties (e.g. Simpson, 1997;Brocchini and Peregrine, 2001;Tamburrino and Gulliver, 2007). The impact of raindrops generated waves and ripples at the water surface and their characteristics were functions of local surface tension.…”
Section: Surface Scars and Transient Frontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a vortex is produced beneath the surface in a breaking process, its rotational velocity reduces the local pressure, thereby deforming the local surface into so-called 'scars'. Brocchini and Peregrine [2001] defined a scar to be 'a parallel line to wave direction near the wave crest on the free-surface where fluid is entrained downward from the surface layer'. When two counterrotating vortices located horizontally beneath the surface induce upwelling flow toward the surface, the surface is lifted, forming a domelike region over the vortices [Sarpkaya, 1996]; in this region, the resulting divergent surface flow replaces the surface with upwelling inner fluid (see Figure 1a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%