2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of Jupiter and Saturn in the gaseous protoplanetary disk

Abstract: We study the possibility that the mutual interactions between Jupiter and Saturn prevented Type II migration from driving these planets much closer to the Sun. Our work extends previous results by Masset and Snellgrove (2001), by exploring a wider set of initial conditions and disk parameters, and by using a new hydrodynamical code that properly describes for the global viscous evolution of the disk. Initially both planets migrate towards the Sun, and Saturn's migration tends to be faster. As a consequence, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
120
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
6
120
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Once in 2/3 resonance configuration, the planets cease migrating inwards. It was shown in Morbidelli and Crida (2007) that the subsequent orbital evolution depends on the properties of the disk, particularly the scale height. In general, both planets migrate outwards together, on a short timescale.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of the Giant Planets In A Gas-diskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once in 2/3 resonance configuration, the planets cease migrating inwards. It was shown in Morbidelli and Crida (2007) that the subsequent orbital evolution depends on the properties of the disk, particularly the scale height. In general, both planets migrate outwards together, on a short timescale.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of the Giant Planets In A Gas-diskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the disk is very thick, the migration rate is very slow, as in Fig 3. For some appropriate disk thickness there is essentially no migration. 2 The presence of asteroids inside of Jupiter's orbit suggests at first sight that Jupiter never 2 Notice that, for two giant planets to avoid inward migration by this mechanism, it is essential that the mass of the outer planet is a fraction of the mass of the inner planet, as in the Jupiter-Saturn case (Masset and Snellgrove, 2001;Morbidelli and Crida, 2007). Planets of comparable masses or with a reversed mass ratio do migrate towards the central star also after resonance trapping.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of the Giant Planets In A Gas-diskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that for models with H DZ 0, and provided that the viscosity is high enough in the live-zone, a migration rate which is lower than the inward drift velocity in the active region can make the disk material from this region flow across the gap. This not only enables the inner disk to be continuously supplied with gas but also creates a positive corotation torque on the planet as the gas flows through the gap (Masset & Snellgrove 2001;Morbidelli & Crida 2007).…”
Section: Orbital Evolution Of Jupiter-mass Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the assumption that the giant planets orbits had their current semimajor axes when the gas was still present is no longer supported. When embedded in a gas disk, planets migrate relative to each other until a resonance configuration is achieved (Peale & Lee 2002;Kley et al 2009;Ferraz-Mello et al 2003;Masset & Snellgrove 2001;Morbidelli & Crida 2007;Pierens & Nelson 2008). Thus it is believed that the giant planets were in resonance with each other when the gas disk disappeared (Morbidelli et al 2007;Thommes et al 2008a;Batygin & Brown 2010) which causes problems in understanding the consequences of the Thommes et al (2008b) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When embedded in a gas disk, planets migrate relative to each other until a resonance configuration is achieved (Peale & Lee 2002;Kley et al 2009;Ferraz-Mello et al 2003;Masset & Snellgrove 2001;Morbidelli & Crida 2007;Pierens & Nelson 2008). Thus it is believed that the giant planets were in resonance with each other when the gas disk disappeared (Morbidelli et al 2007;Thommes et al 2008a;Batygin & Brown 2010) which causes problems in understanding the consequences of the Thommes et al (2008b) model. Moreover, the Nagasawa et al (2005) and Thommes et al (2008a) simulations produce the terrestrial planets too quickly (∼10 Myr), compared to the timing of moon formation indicated by the 182 Hf-182 W chronometer (>30 Myr and most likely >50 Myr; Kleine et al 2009) and they completely deplete the asteroid belt by the combination of resonance sweeping and gas-drag (see also Morishima et al 2010, for a discussion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%