2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-014-0422-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of ICT adaptation and the productivity gaps across advanced nations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same did not occur in the case of “low quality cost” construct, which we developed based on the work of Yang (2008). Finally, with regard to the development of measures related to the benefits and costs of the ICT axis, the lack of validated scales in previous studies prompted us to develop our own proposal based on a review of the literature (Perego et al , 2011; Richey et al , 2012; Nurmilaakso, 2014; Kuusi, 2015). Table IV shows the wording of the items used in the questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same did not occur in the case of “low quality cost” construct, which we developed based on the work of Yang (2008). Finally, with regard to the development of measures related to the benefits and costs of the ICT axis, the lack of validated scales in previous studies prompted us to develop our own proposal based on a review of the literature (Perego et al , 2011; Richey et al , 2012; Nurmilaakso, 2014; Kuusi, 2015). Table IV shows the wording of the items used in the questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the costs deriving from the implementation of ICTs in a relationship, we identify: the economic cost of using ICTs and the communication process itself (Thun, 2010; Nurmilaakso, 2014); the time cost related to the implementation and obsolescence of a technology (Xie et al , 2016); the adaptation cost, or the loss of experience in the use of a new technology (Kuusi, 2015); and, the incompatibility cost, or the impossibility of using a certain technology along the supply chain (Nurmilaakso, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey of Cardona et al (2013) finds that the majority of studies report a positive and significant impact of ICT on productivity; a similar effect is found by Lehr and Lichtenberg (1998) for federal agencies. Kuusi (2015), following a theoretical exposition, establishes a leader-follower relationship between US and EU-15 (using DEA techniques). Pieri, Vecchi and Venturini (2017) find that ICT has been effective in reducing inefficiency and in generating inter-industry spillovers (using a translog stochastic frontier).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most noteworthy core benefits include seller support (Harrison-Walker, 2012;Ulaga and Eggert, 2006a), order delivery (Kujala et al, 2013), product quality (Nguyen and Nguyen, 2011), customisation (Thrulogachantar and Zailani, 2011) and personnel training (Ulaga and Reinartz, 2011). The most noteworthy core sacrifices are ICT costs, or those costs deriving from investment in technology and adaptation to it in the B2B relationship (Kuusi, 2015;Nurmilaakso, 2014;Xie et al, 2016), and low quality cost, related to product or service defects (Cheah et al, 2011).…”
Section: Relationship Valuementioning
confidence: 99%