2000
DOI: 10.1575/1912/2720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of geometrically compliant mooring systems

Abstract: Geometrically compliant mooring systems that change their shape to accommodate deformations are common in oceanographic and offshore energy production applications. Because of the inherent geometric nonlinearities, analyses of such systems typically require the use of a sophisticated numerical model. This thesis describes one such model and uses that model along with experimental results to develop simpler forms for understanding the dynamic response of geometrically compliant moorings.The numerical program co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar numerical schemes like the box method obtain similar performance in terms of the accuracy of the approximation but are reportedly more prone to numerical instabilities. The generalized alpha method suggested in (Gobat 2000) and (Gobat et al 2001) rectifies the instability by enforcing additional temporal averaging on the conventional box method scheme of (, Ablow et al 1983). In applying the derivative discretization rule (10) the forward problem in consideration is cast in a matrix form as (Milinazzo et al 1987),…”
Section: Numerical Solution Of Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar numerical schemes like the box method obtain similar performance in terms of the accuracy of the approximation but are reportedly more prone to numerical instabilities. The generalized alpha method suggested in (Gobat 2000) and (Gobat et al 2001) rectifies the instability by enforcing additional temporal averaging on the conventional box method scheme of (, Ablow et al 1983). In applying the derivative discretization rule (10) the forward problem in consideration is cast in a matrix form as (Milinazzo et al 1987),…”
Section: Numerical Solution Of Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from Newton's method, alternative schemes for the forward problem include the Runge-Kutta integration which is implemented on the space dependent differential equations after the time derivatives are eliminated by FD discretization (Ablow et al 1983). The method is fairly robust to numerical instabilities although special suppression routines like those implemented in (Gatti 2002) and (Gobat 2000) are necessary to ensure that the solution remains a bounded norm in the presence of Crank-Nicholson noise.…”
Section: Numerical Solution Of Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the frequency increases, nonlinear drag (which increases with the square of frequency) provides very large lateral resistance, causing the mooring line to 'freeze' in place and the WEC motion to be then accommodated elastically by the mooring line [64]. The thesis by Gobat [65] focuses on the dynamics of geometrically compliant moorings.…”
Section: Compliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polachek et al [45] later added cable extensibility, thereby offering a thorough method for treating the nonlinear mooring line dynamics. Their discretisation method would nowadays be categorized as a lumped mass method, whereby the mass and externally applied forces are lumped at a discrete number of points/nodes, which are connected by massless springs [65]. The lumped mass method and other spatial discretisation approaches, such as finite differences and finite element methods (FEMs), are outlined in this subsection.…”
Section: Discretisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation