2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-016-0164-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of Ascaris lumbricoides Infections

Abstract: Abstract:The Anderson-May model of human parasite infections, and specifically that for the intestinal worm Ascaris lumbricoides is reconsidered, with a view to deriving the observed characteristic negative binomial distribution which is frequently found in human communities. The means to obtaining this result lies in reformulating the continuous Anderson-May model as a stochastic process involving two essential populations, the density of mature worms in the gut, and the density of mature eggs in the environm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a new model framework inspired by the well-established two-stage delay differential equation model developed by Anderson and May that considers the interaction between the mean worm burden ( M ) and the number of infective larval stages present in the immediate environment ( L ) [ 34 ]. Using a similar approach to Fowler et al [ 35 ], this new framework is easier to describe, implement and fit as it removes the need for delays. Here we additionally consider the mean number of juvenile worms per host ( J ) and the total count of immature eggs in the environment ( E ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a new model framework inspired by the well-established two-stage delay differential equation model developed by Anderson and May that considers the interaction between the mean worm burden ( M ) and the number of infective larval stages present in the immediate environment ( L ) [ 34 ]. Using a similar approach to Fowler et al [ 35 ], this new framework is easier to describe, implement and fit as it removes the need for delays. Here we additionally consider the mean number of juvenile worms per host ( J ) and the total count of immature eggs in the environment ( E ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of elimination, given a particular prevalence (e.g., 1%), can be calculated by considering the probability that a chain of transmission will die out (in mathematics we call this chain a branching process [ 22 ] ). These types of branching process methods have been used for soil-transmitted helminths [ 23 , 24 ], but have been adapted here to account for vector-borne transmission with an aggregated bite risk [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Sexual Reproduction In the Host And Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We set a uniform prior for log of the mean number of worms log( W ) ∼ U [log(0.01), log(60)] and a uniform prior for the degree of clumping k ∼ U [0, 3]. Although typical values for mean worm burden are 10-20 (33), much higher numbers have been observed in field conditions (19; 34).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%