2008
DOI: 10.3763/aedm.2008.0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of Actors' and Stakeholders' Participation: An Approach of Management by Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, actors play different roles within the project team (Moore, 2002). Third, these roles tend to change during the course of the project (Boutinet, 1990, 2004; de Blois & DeConinck, 2009). Fourth, two types of organizational structures often coexist: the formal and the informal (Dainty et al, 2006; Mintzberg, 1990).…”
Section: Results: How the Contingency Factors Influence The Dynamic Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, actors play different roles within the project team (Moore, 2002). Third, these roles tend to change during the course of the project (Boutinet, 1990, 2004; de Blois & DeConinck, 2009). Fourth, two types of organizational structures often coexist: the formal and the informal (Dainty et al, 2006; Mintzberg, 1990).…”
Section: Results: How the Contingency Factors Influence The Dynamic Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first, Sebastian (2006) studies the process of multi-architect collaborations and contends that the role of a design manager is one of an informal leader with the goal of achieving a shared understanding of the design frames. In the second study, de Blois and De Coninck (2008) explicate stakeholder participation in design through the implementation of design concepts for managerial practices. This paper will continue this theoretical trajectory and elaborate the concept of decision-making frames to explain the process-level interdisciplinary design management.…”
Section: Reflective Practice In Aedmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this analysis, we considered the following: All stakeholders’ roles (as done by Chinyio & Olomolaiye, ; de Blois & De Coninck, , ); The structures and mechanisms of coordination and communication between actors—formal and informal (as done by de Blois, and de Blois et al, ); Construction‐specific contingency factors that influence the structuring of the temporary multi‐organization, namely the internal structure of the project client and informal relationships between actors (as proposed by de Blois & Lizarralde, and Lizarralde, de Blois, & Latunova, ) and; The complexity of the relations between the intra‐ and inter‐organizations that shape the temporary multi‐organization (as done by Lizarralde, de Blois, & Davidson, ). The organizational structure of the Sépaq and the temporary multi‐organization created to conduct the projects are represented in Figure . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) All stakeholders' roles (as done by Chinyio & Olomolaiye, 2010 ;de Blois & De Coninck, 2008, 2009;…”
Section: Representing the Temporary Multi-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%