2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamical status of the cluster of galaxies 1E0657-56

Abstract: Abstract. We present the results of a new spectroscopic and photometric survey of the hot X-ray cluster 1E0657-56, at z = 0.296. We determine the presence of a low velocity dispersion subcluster, which is offset from the main cluster position by 0.7 Mpc and 600 km s −1 . We determine the virial masses and total luminosities of the cluster and its subcluster, and solve for the two-body dynamical model. With additional constraints from the results of the analysis of the cluster X-ray emission by Markevitch et al… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
134
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
18
134
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This non detection might be the result of a less favourable merger geometry, with a larger angle separating the A2163 collision axis from the sky plane. As discussed in Paper I, the galaxy velocity distribution in the main cluster indeed shows a strong velocity gradient of ∼1250 km s −1 along a NE/SW axis, which is much higher than the velocity offset of ∼600 km s −1 separating the two galaxy components of 1E 0657-56 (Barrena et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This non detection might be the result of a less favourable merger geometry, with a larger angle separating the A2163 collision axis from the sky plane. As discussed in Paper I, the galaxy velocity distribution in the main cluster indeed shows a strong velocity gradient of ∼1250 km s −1 along a NE/SW axis, which is much higher than the velocity offset of ∼600 km s −1 separating the two galaxy components of 1E 0657-56 (Barrena et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Comparing to the current estimates of the mass will allow us to assess which solutions are acceptable (Barrena et al 2002). We have taken R p = 1.25 Mpc and V r = 200 km s −1 (from Paper I), and set t to 10 Gyr (the age of the universe at z = 0.2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KMM algorithm uses the maximum-likelihood ratio test to estimate how likely the two-system solution is to be a significant improvement over the single-system solution (e.g. Barrena, Biviano & Ramella 2002).…”
Section: Subclusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property has recently boosted an entire research field of cluster surveys with the SZ effect (Carlstrom et al 2002). In fact, "flux-limited" SZ cluster surveys are almost mass-limited cluster surveys (Bartlett 2006). This property is extremely relevant, because the mass of clusters is a sensible cosmological probe, as we explain below.…”
Section: Clusters As Probes For Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The cluster 1ES 0657-55.8, dubbed "the bullet cluster" (Markevitch et al 2002;Barrena et al 2002), is a spectacular example of a merging cluster at intermediate redshift (z = 0.296). At low redshifts, there are many other examples of merging clusters or galaxy groups falling onto clusters along filamentary structure.…”
Section: Substructure Mass Accretion and Non-thermal Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%