Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3313837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Duty to Read the Unreadable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the percentage of privacy policies that are accessible considering the average reading grade of the common users falls below 10%. A similar study on ToS of 500 popular websites by Benoliel et al [1] observed that 498 of the sample ToS require a reading grade of 9 and higher.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was observed that the percentage of privacy policies that are accessible considering the average reading grade of the common users falls below 10%. A similar study on ToS of 500 popular websites by Benoliel et al [1] observed that 498 of the sample ToS require a reading grade of 9 and higher.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For validation dataset A, we compared the average of user rating to the ViCLOUD score for that document in range [1][2][3][4][5]. For validation dataset B, we compared the average of user rating to the ViCLOUD score for that document in range [1][2][3]. We used the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure the correlation between ViCLOUD score and average user opinion.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is because people may often fail to read fine print terms, 49 lack the reading skills required to understand fine print terms, or be steered to certain less than welfare-enhancing choices by the form of the terms 50 and the risks they allocate. 51 People also find making significant decisions concerning the future difficult, 52 particularly when operating under considerable stress and involving technology about which they have little experience. 53 These insights mean that consent should not be used to justify technological options that otherwise pose risks for individuals.…”
Section: Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%