The Dutch Memory Compensation Questionnaire

Elst, Wim Van der; Hoogenhout, Esther M.; Dixon, Roger A.; Groot, Renate H. M. de; Jolles, Jelle

doi:10.1177/1073191110370116

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the present study showed that the factor structure of the French version is consistent with the factor structures that were obtained in English-, Spanish-, and Dutch- speaking samples (see de Frias & Dixon, 2005; Van der Elst et al, 2011), supporting the cross-national robustness of the MCQ. The expected seven factors underlie the item responses of the French version of the MCQ (i.e.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…In addition, pattern of correlations were consistent with the English- and Dutch- versions: all scale scores of the French adaptation were positively correlated with each other (see Table 3); as well as with the total score of the MCQ (all r > .45, p<.01). Findings indicate that individuals use more than one type of strategies which fit with Van der Elst et al (2011).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An a priori model was considered in which (a) seven factors underlie the item responses of the French version of the MCQ, and (b) each item loads on one factor only (i.e., the factor model that was obtained by de Frias & Dixon, 2005, and by Van der Elst et al, 2011). Due to the categorical nature of the item responses and the non-normal score distributions of different items, the Diagonally Weighted Least Squares method for polychoric correlation matrices was used (instead of the standard Maximum Likelihood estimation method).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This example illustrates that it would be useful to have normative MCQ data available for the entire adult life. Indeed, robust results demonstrated a persistent impact of age and gender on the report of compensation strategies to improve day-to-day functioning (de Frias, Dixon & Bäckman, 2003; Dixon, de Frias & Bäckman, 2001; Van der Elst et al , 2011). De Frias et al (2003) indicated that age, gender and level of education accounted between 2% to 9% of the variance in strategy use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous works have shown that demographic (and other) variables affected several of the MCQ scale scores (de Frias et al, 2003; Dixon & de Frias, 2007, Van der Elst et al, 2011). Thus, we also evaluated the effects of age, gender, and level of education on the scale scores of the French version of the MCQ, so that the normative data could be appropriately corrected for the relevant demographic influences.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Compensating for memory losses throughout aging: Validation and normalization of the memory compensation questionnaire (MCQ) for non-clinical French populations

Martin¹,

Mazzocco²,

Maury³

et al. 2015

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The MCQ is a seven-factor scale that measures individual differences in the tendency to select particular strategies and to overcome perceived or real memory losses. Our aim was to establish a French version of the MCQ and to evaluate its psychometric properties in a lifespan perspective. We first tested the underlying factor structure of the MCQ in a large sample of 749 adults from aged from 18 to 92 years. Results showed that the factor structure of the French version corresponded well with the one obtained in English-, Dutch- and Spanish-speaking samples, supporting the cross-national robustness of the MCQ. We confirmed a seven-factor order model that supports the construct validity of the questionnaire. The reliabilities of the scales were good (α > .70) to acceptable (α = .66 and .62). Criterion validity was verified by means of significant correlations between health composites and MCQ subscales. Gender and Age affected most of the MCQ subscales but not the level of education. The MCQ revealed to be a heuristic tool for assessing daily compensatory behaviors that are developed in order to achieve successful aging. Thus, regression-based normative data and a user-friendly computer program were provided to facilitate scoring and norming by clinicians and researchers dealing with aging.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Compensating for memory losses throughout aging: Validation and normalization of the memory compensation questionnaire (MCQ) for non-clinical French populations

Martin¹,

Mazzocco²,

Maury³

et al. 2015

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the multifactorial memory questionnaire for adults and the elderly

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliable and valid metamemory measures are needed to assess subjective memory complaints that can be distinct from objective memory performance. The Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) evaluates dimensions of subjective memory functioning such as frequency of memory problems (Ability), affect related to memory abilities (Contentment), and strategy use in everyday life (Strategy). To examine the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the MMQ, six hundred Italian healthy individuals (aged 25-91 years) completed MMQ, a questionnaire assessing metacognition (Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, CFQ) and two batteries assessing cognitive global status (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA; Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE). MMQ was easy to administer, acceptable, and had good test-retest reliability (r for the total MMQ score 0.95), and internal consistency (Cronbach's α for the total MMQ score = 0.83). An exploratory factor analysis provided a four-factor solution: "Ability" (α = 0.99), "Contentment" (α = 0.91), "External Strategies" (α = 0.85) and "Internal Strategies" (α = 0.78) factors. MMQ total score and MMQ-Ability factor score showed good convergent validity when compared to CFQ score (r rho ≥ 0.51), whereas MMQ total score and the four MMQ factors showed good divergent validity when compared to MoCA and MMSE score (r rho ≤ 0.27). Demographic variables significantly influenced MMQ total score and most subscale scores. From the derived linear equations, we computed correction factors for raw scores and percentile distribution of adjusted scores. The Italian version of MMQ is reliable and valid to assess dimensions of metamemory in adult and elderly subjects.

show abstract

Assessment of apathy independent of physical disability: validation of the Dimensional Apathy Scale in Italian healthy sample

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Apathy is well described in neurodegenerative diseases characterized by motor disability; therefore, assessment of apathy avoiding possible confounding effects of motor impairments is necessary in neurological diseases. Recently, the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS) was developed to assess apathy as multifaceted construct, independent of physical disability. We developed the Italian version of the Dimensional Apathy Scale (I-DAS) and explored its psychometric properties in a sample of 309 healthy individuals. Participants also completed Apathy Evaluation Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised. The I-DAS showed high internal consistency, good convergent and divergent validity. The I-DAS had a three-factor structure, such as the original scale. The I-DAS scored was significantly correlated with individuals' education, but not with age or gender. We, therefore, computed correction factor for education and provided percentile distribution of the adjusted scores to identify individuals with high levels of apathy. The I-DAS showed good psychometric properties and can be a valid and reliable tool to assess multidimensional apathy.

show abstract

The Dutch Memory Compensation Questionnaire

Cited by 19 publications

References 29 publications

Compensating for memory losses throughout aging: Validation and normalization of the memory compensation questionnaire (MCQ) for non-clinical French populations

Compensating for memory losses throughout aging: Validation and normalization of the memory compensation questionnaire (MCQ) for non-clinical French populations

Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the multifactorial memory questionnaire for adults and the elderly

Assessment of apathy independent of physical disability: validation of the Dimensional Apathy Scale in Italian healthy sample

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About