2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00172-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The durability of jute fibre-reinforced phenolic composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of composites in tension upon exposure was ≈ 3%, 5%, 10% and 11% respectively over control samples as it is showed on the histogram below: Figure 8. Residual apparent tensile strength of tested GFRP composites One early effect of this alkaline aqueous environment was the appearance of a milky colour on the surface of composites as reported elsewhere [28].…”
Section: Durability Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The loss of composites in tension upon exposure was ≈ 3%, 5%, 10% and 11% respectively over control samples as it is showed on the histogram below: Figure 8. Residual apparent tensile strength of tested GFRP composites One early effect of this alkaline aqueous environment was the appearance of a milky colour on the surface of composites as reported elsewhere [28].…”
Section: Durability Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The ageing process could make the composite surface rougher and also could lead to significant fibre loss from the surface according to other researchers [29].…”
Section: Effect Of Accelerated Ageing On Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The moisture absorbed by the composite produced mainly the swell of the reinforcement but also the plasticization of both the polyester resin and the natural reinforcement, as it was reported for similar systems. 28 However, because the adhesion between the acetonewashed jute and the polyester resin was better than in the other composites, the empty space between the fiber and the matrix was limited, and the fiber could not swell very much; thus, the decrease in impact energy due to the absorbed moisture was the lowest. In the case of the untreated and detergent-washed composites, the fibers could swell more than the acetone-washed ones; the empty space between the reinforcement and the resin disappeared, and the fibers exerted pressure on the matrix.…”
Section: Water Sorptionmentioning
confidence: 98%