2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.11.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dunkl–Williams constant, convexity, smoothness and normal structure

Abstract: In this paper we exhibit some connections between the Dunkl-Williams constant and some other well-known constants and notions. We establish bounds for the Dunkl-Williams constant that explain and quantify a characterization of uniformly nonsquare Banach spaces in terms of the Dunkl-Williams constant given by M. Baronti and P.L. Papini. We also study the relationship between Dunkl-Williams constant, the fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings and normal structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that IB(X) > 1/2 if and only if the space X is uniformly non-square. To do this, we need to recall the Dunkl-Williams constant defined in [8]:…”
Section: Thus We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that IB(X) > 1/2 if and only if the space X is uniformly non-square. To do this, we need to recall the Dunkl-Williams constant defined in [8]:…”
Section: Thus We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the frame of B X is defined by frm(B X ) = {E( f ) : f is a support functional for B X }. This was first introduced in [18] to construct a new calculation method for the Dunkl-Williams constant (compare [14]). Its geometric and topological properties were studied in [21].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], three geometric constants have been computed for Morrey spaces. The first two constants, namely Von Neumann-Jordan constant and James constant, are closely related to the notion of uniformly non-squareness of (the unit ball in) a Banach space [5,6,8]. For a general Banach space ( , ‖ • ‖ ), the constants are defined by Note also that, for 1 ∞, we have [2,3]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%