2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dual reciprocity boundary element formulation for convection-diffusion-reaction problems with variable velocity field using different radial basis functions

Abstract: This paper presents a dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) formulation for the solution of steady-state convection-diffusion-reaction problems with variable velocity field at moderately high Péclet number. This scheme is based on utilising the fundamental solution of the convection-diffusion-reaction equation with constant coefficients. In this case, we decompose the velocity field into an average and a perturbation, with the latter being treated using a dual reciprocity approximation to convert th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in this study, it is shown Dual reciprocity boundary element method that the boundary element formulation developed precluded the need for 'upwind' or other algorithms which are common to the FEM and FVM, and they also made a decision to implement robust schemes for solving equations ( 3) and ( 4) in this research. The authors' have shown, in previous works on the subject, the solution of the corresponding problem with variable velocity fields (Al-Bayati and Wrobel, 2017Wrobel, , 2018aWrobel, , 2019. In fact, the key part of the paper falls on the development of a BEM and DRBEM formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, in this study, it is shown Dual reciprocity boundary element method that the boundary element formulation developed precluded the need for 'upwind' or other algorithms which are common to the FEM and FVM, and they also made a decision to implement robust schemes for solving equations ( 3) and ( 4) in this research. The authors' have shown, in previous works on the subject, the solution of the corresponding problem with variable velocity fields (Al-Bayati and Wrobel, 2017Wrobel, , 2018aWrobel, , 2019. In fact, the key part of the paper falls on the development of a BEM and DRBEM formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the functions ψ and η do not need to be numerically approximated as they are known functions for a specific set F . As seen in our previous work (Al-Bayati and Wrobel, 2018a), every node i will generate an equation like the above. It is also assumed that the number of points M exceeds the number of boundary nodes N by L units.…”
Section: Discretisation Of the Transient Problem Using Dual Reciproci...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these studies include Fendoglu et al [1] in 2018, Wang and Ang [2] in 2018, Sheu et al [3] in 2000, Xu [4] in 2018, and AL-Bayati and Wrobel [5] in 2019, who considered the DCR equation with constant coefficients. Samec and Škerget [6] in 2004, Rocca et al [7] in 2005, and AL-Bayati and Wrobel [8,9] in 2018 studied the DCR equation with variable velocity. Martinez et al [10] used nonstandard finite difference schemes based on Green's function formulations for reaction-diffusion-convection systems in 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em casos de velocidade variável, propostas que usam a decomposição do campo de velocidade como uma média adicionada de uma flutuação, respectivamente abordadas pela formulação clássica e pela dupla reciprocidade, apresentam desempenho satisfatório para Péclet globais de baixos a altos [1,10]. Entretanto, a aplicação isolada da formulação da técnica da dupla reciprocidade em problemas advectivos difusivos é escassa na literatura tanto para campos uniformes de velocidade quanto para campos variáveis o que cria uma maior demanda por comparar a performance da mesma frente a outras técnicas baseadas em aproximações por bases radiais como a MECID, por exemplo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified