The dual-pathway model of collective action: Impacts of types of collective action and social identity

Shi, Jing; Zhou, Hao; Saeri, Alexander K; Cui, Lijuan

doi:10.1177/1368430214524288

Cited by 42 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several empirical studies that are in line with our findings explain that when performing collective action, the emotion felt by an individual is the group's emotion as a response to the situation experienced by their group, especially anger (Shepherd et al, 2013;Shi et al, 2014; Stewart et al, 2015;van Zomeren et al, 2011). Other studies found that outgroup-directed emotion plays a more important role in future protesting behaviour .…”

Section: Participation In Collective Action and Self-based Vs Group-supporting

confidence: 78%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

Ariyanto¹,

Muluk²,

Newcombe³

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Participation In Collective Action and Self-based Vs Group-supporting

confidence: 78%

“…Many studies have proved that group-based anger is a predictor of collective action (Shepherd et al, 2013;Shi et al, 2014;Stewart et al, 2015;van Zomeren et al, 2011). This evidence is relevant for collective action in general, not only for normative action.…”

Section: Emotion As a Predictor Of Collective Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

Ariyanto¹,

Muluk²,

Newcombe³

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Within social protest contexts, collective action is typically predicted by ingroup identification and efficacy, and outgroup-directed anger (across different groups, disadvantages, issues, countries, and samples; for a meta-analysis see Van Zomeren et al, 2008; for primary research see Becker & Tausch, 2013;Cakal, Hewstone, Schwär, & Heath, 2011;Shi, Hao, Saeri, & Cui, 2015;Tabri & Conway, 2011). 1 This is not surprising because social protest contexts typically include (a) a relevant ingroup that seeks to achieve group goals through collective action (e.g., changing one's collective disadvantage or position in society), and (b) a contextually available and relevant target for anger (e.g., the government, authorities, or advantaged group in society).…”

Section: The Curious Context-dependent Case Of Angermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In social protest contexts, the emotional experience of anger requires a relevant outgroup as its target, which is typically contextually available (Klandermans, 1997;Runciman, 1966;Solak, Jost, S€ umer, & Clore, 2012;Walker & Smith, 2002). Indeed, anger is an approach emotion (Carver & Harmon-Jones, 2009;Van Zomeren et al, 2012) that reflects the emotional experience of group-based unfairness that has been found to be predictive of collective action (Abrams & Grant, 2012;Shi et al, 2015;Smith, Pettigrew, Pippin, & Bialosiewicz, 2012;Solak et al, 2012;Tabri & Conway, 2011;Tausch et al, 2011;Van Zomeren, Spears, Fischer, & Leach, 2004;Zhou & Wang, 2012). Because social protest contexts often include a relevant outgroup that can be blamed for unfairness, it may not be surprising that outgroup-directed anger is such a prominent predictor in these contexts.…”

Section: Outgroup-directed Angermentioning

confidence: 99%

The curious, context‐dependent case of anger: Explaining voting intentions in three different national elections

Zomeren

Saguy

Mazzoni

et al. 2018

J Applied Social Pyschol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collective action is typically studied in social protest contexts and predicted by different motivations (i.e., ingroup identification and efficacy beliefs, and outgroup‐directed anger). Assuming that voting to some extent reflects a form of collective action, we tested whether these three different motivations predicted voting in Dutch, Israeli, and Italian national election contexts. Based on previous meta‐analyses on voting and collective action, we hypothesized that identification with and efficacy beliefs regarding this party would motivate voting across the different elections (i.e., context‐independent effects). As for anger, we predicted more context‐dependent effects, depending on whether the anger is targeting the previous government or at the political system at large. Results were largely in line with predictions, showing the relatively context‐independent motivational power of party identification and efficacy beliefs, and clearly context‐dependent effects for anger. Specifically, we found little support for a similar motivational power of anger targeting previous government policies, but anger targeting politics in general demotivated Dutch and Israeli participants to vote (interpreted as an expression of political cynicism), while curiously motivating Italian participants to vote (interpreted as a desire for system change from “old” to “new” politics). We discuss these findings in the context of voting in national elections, and recommend further integration of the voting and social protest literatures.

show abstract

“…There are three main theories that explain collective action (Shi, Hao, Saeri, & Cui, 2015;van Zomeren & Iyer, 2009), namely, Relative deprivation theory (RDT; Smith, Pettigrew, Pippin, & Bialosiewicz, 2012), resource mobilization theory (RMT; McCarthy & Zald, 1977), and social identity theory (SIT; Tajfel & Turner, 1979). attempted to combine the three theories in a model called social identity model of collective action (SIMCA), comprising three causative factors in the form of group-based anger, group efficacy, and social identity, which are included in an integrative model.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Palestinian Solidarity Action: The Dynamics of Politicized and Religious Identity Patterns Among Student Activists

Shadiqi¹,

Muluk²,

Milla³

2018

Makara Hubs-Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study attempted to explain the factors that lead Muslim student activists to participate in Palestinian solidarity actions by testing the Social Identity Model Collective Action model (SIMCA, van Zomeren, Postmes, & Spears, 2008). A survey of 303 student members/administrators of Islamic organizations was conducted. The sample was obtained from more than seven Islamic-based student organizations. Collective solidarity actions were comprised of peaceful actions such as demonstrations, protests, and petition signings. The model involved two identities (politicized and religious) and two mediators (group efficacy and group-based anger). Results of the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis suggest that politicized identity, as indicated by strength of participants' affiliations with Islamic movement organizations, predicts solidarity action intention more effectively than religious identity. Other study findings demonstrated that group efficacy is a significant partial mediator of the interaction between politicized and religious identities, and collective action. Religious identity has a stronger interaction with collective action than politicized identity within the partial mediating effect of group efficacy. Meanwhile group-based anger does not influence the desire to engage in collective action either directly or as a mediator. Aksi solidaritas Palestina: Dinamika Pola Identitas Terpolitisasi dan Keagamaan pada Aktivis Mahasiswa AbstrakPenelitian ini berusaha menjelaskan faktor yang menyebabkan aktivis mahasiswa muslim ingin mengikuti aksi solidaritas Palestina melalui pengujian model Social Identity Model Collective Action (SIMCA, van Zomeren, Postmes, & Spears, 2008). Kami melakukan survei terhadap 303 mahasiswa anggota/pengurus organisasi Islam. Sampel berasal dari lebih tujuh organisasi mahasiswa berbasis agama Islam. Aksi kolektif solidaritas meliputi aksi damai seperti demonstrasi, protes, dan tanda tangan petisi. Model yang dianalisis melibatkan dua identitas (terpolitisasi dan keagamaan) dan dua mediator (efikasi kelompok dan marah berbasis kelompok). Hasil analisis Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) menemukan identitas terpolitisasi yang ditunjukkan dengan kekuatan afiliasi partisipan terhadap organisasi pergerakan Islam, ditemukan lebih memprediksi intensi aksi solidaritas daripada identitas keagamaan. Temuan lain menunjukkan bahwa efikasi kelompok signifikan menjadi mediator parsial dari interaksi antara identitas terpolitisasi dan identitas keagamaan terhadap aksi kolektif. Identitas keagamaan memiliki interaksi yang lebih kuat daripada identitas terpolitisasi pada aksi kolektif melalui efek parsial mederasi dari efikasi kelompok. Sementara emosi marah berbasis kelompok tidak memengaruhi keinginan terlibat pada aksi kolektif secara langsung maupun sebagai mediator.

show abstract

The dual-pathway model of collective action: Impacts of types of collective action and social identity

Cited by 42 publications

References 40 publications

Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

The curious, context‐dependent case of anger: Explaining voting intentions in three different national elections

Palestinian Solidarity Action: The Dynamics of Politicized and Religious Identity Patterns Among Student Activists

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About