1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7894(76)80165-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dropout problem: Reducing attrition in obesity research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A need to pay for the treatment significantly increased dropout levels (17,21,57). The existence of a monetary deposit to be refunded contingent upon attendance was associated with reduced attrition rates (67–69), whereas a monetary penalty for failure to attend or lose weight (70) was associated with increased attrition. Increased attrition was associated with individual treatment mode in one study (43) and with group treatment mode in another (71).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A need to pay for the treatment significantly increased dropout levels (17,21,57). The existence of a monetary deposit to be refunded contingent upon attendance was associated with reduced attrition rates (67–69), whereas a monetary penalty for failure to attend or lose weight (70) was associated with increased attrition. Increased attrition was associated with individual treatment mode in one study (43) and with group treatment mode in another (71).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering, however, that subjects made a monetary deposit prior to beginning the program, a dropout rate of 59% is somewhat high. Only 8% of those persons depositing a similar amount of money prior to their treatment program in the Hagen et al, (1976) study terminated treatment prematurely. Several differences exist between the present study and the one by Hagen which may account for this discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Douglas, Ford, and Munro (1981) report dropout rates of 21% after the initial visit, 39% after three months, and 69% after twelve months in their nonbehavioral hospital obesity clinic in Scotland. While monetary deposits are sometimes useful for controlling attrition rates (e.g., Abrahms & Allen, 1974;Hagen, Foreyt, & Durham, 1976), the use of a deposit does not guarantee a low dropout rate. Furthermore, such deposits are often difficult to collect in a clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, some techniques have been developed to increase follow‐up rates, including paying the patient with money (e.g., Davis, Estess, Simonton, & Gonda, 1977) or lottery tickets (Norman, McFarlane, Streiner, & Kneale, 1982), or having the person give a deposit that is refunded in part at each visit (e.g., Hagan, Foreyt, & Durham, 1976). Some studies have gone so far as to place ads in newspapers and hire private detectives to find subjects; through “heroic,” albeit expensive, means, one multicenter, multicountry study was able to trace all except 2 of its 1,377 subjects (EC/IC Bypass Study Group, 1985).…”
Section: Follow‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%