Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1996.493070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The drop from front strategy in TCP and in TCP over ATM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the congestion alleviation period T a : E[T a ] = T for Droptail, but E[T a ] = D for Dropfront, since the propagation of loss does not need to wait at the queueing delay. This advantage of Dropfront has been qualitatively stated in [16], but not quantitatively studied before.…”
Section: The Reason That Dropfront Queue Reduces E[m ]mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consider the congestion alleviation period T a : E[T a ] = T for Droptail, but E[T a ] = D for Dropfront, since the propagation of loss does not need to wait at the queueing delay. This advantage of Dropfront has been qualitatively stated in [16], but not quantitatively studied before.…”
Section: The Reason That Dropfront Queue Reduces E[m ]mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For those realistic cases, M is no longer a constant, and global synchronization is avoided. Furthermore, if "drop from front" option (Dropfront) [16] is selected, M is not a constant either. All these analysis are validated by extensive ns-2 simulations in Section VI.…”
Section: Synchronization Of Packet Loss Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lakshman et al [12] carried out a simulation of TCP/IP over Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) to study the throughput of RED, and found that an exponential drop function is better than the linear drop function of RED. However, an exponential drop function may require more computing power, and may not be easily implemented in hardware except in certain limiting conditions.…”
Section: Throughput Of Redmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should there be enough buer space for the incoming HR service packet after discarding LA service packet(s), we discard LA service packets from the head of linked list L LA along linked list L LA until there is just enough free buer space to allow the incoming HR service packet to enter the buer. The reason why we discard LA packets from the head (instead of from the tail) of linked list L LA is that this will make TCP acknowledgment to be conveyed to the TCP source earlier than is the case under taildiscarding, which translates into quicker reaction to congestion and considerable performance improvement [16].…”
Section: Spred Node Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%