2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/4726763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Driver Time Memory Car-Following Model Simulating in Apollo Platform with GRU and Real Road Traffic Data

Abstract: Car following is the most common phenomenon in single-lane traffic. The accuracy of acceleration prediction can be effectively improved by the driver’s memory in car-following behaviour. In addition, the Apollo autonomous driving platform launched by Baidu Inc. provides fast test vehicle following vehicle models. Therefore, this paper proposes a car-following model (CFDT) with driver time memory based on real-world traffic data. The CFDT model is firstly constructed by embedded gantry control unit storage capa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other data-driven models, which outperformed mathematical methods, have been put forward (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Data-driven car-following models that consider the effect of driver memory have also been proposed (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). These models utilize recurrent neural networks (RNNs), gated recurrent units, or LSTM models to replicate human driving styles, and have demonstrated promising results in capturing complex car-following behaviors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other data-driven models, which outperformed mathematical methods, have been put forward (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Data-driven car-following models that consider the effect of driver memory have also been proposed (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). These models utilize recurrent neural networks (RNNs), gated recurrent units, or LSTM models to replicate human driving styles, and have demonstrated promising results in capturing complex car-following behaviors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was introduced as a simpler alternative to the more complex Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, which were originally developed to address the vanishing gradient problem in traditional RNNs [20]. GRU was proposed by Cho, Kyunghyun; van Merrienboer, Bart; Bahdanau, DZmitry; Bougares, Fethi; Schwenk, Holger; and Bengio, Yoshua as a way to maintain similar modelling capabilities to LSTMs while simplifying the architecture and are known for their efficiency and practicality [21,22]. In the context of understanding GRUs, it's important to highlight key differentiators from LSTMs, including the reduction in the number of parameters, simplified training processes, and the role of specific gates like the update gate 𝑧 𝑡 , and the reset gate 𝑟 𝑡 .…”
Section: Gated Recurrent Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jafaripournimchahi et al developed a new CF model to investigate the effects of driver anticipation and driver memory on traffic flow [13]. Fei et al developed a CF model with driver time memory based on real-world traffic data, which is effective and robust, thereby improving simulation accuracy [14]. Chen et al believed that data-driven CF models could be a promising research direction [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%