2018
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aae2ba
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Draconid Meteoroid Stream 2018: Prospects for Satellite Impact Detection

Abstract: Predictions of the 2018 Draconid activity at the Earth and the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 Lagrange points are presented. Numerical simulations of the meteoroids' ejection and evolution from comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner are performed with a careful implementation of the results analysis and weighting. Model meteoroid fluxes at Earth are derived using as calibration the main peak date, intensity, and shower profiles of previous Draconid outbursts. Good agreement between the model and measurements is found for the 1933, 1… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The best agreement between the simulated and the observed activity profiles for the four visual showers was obtained for an ejecta size distribution index u of 2.9. This value differs from our previous published estimate of 2.64 (Egal et al, 2018); differences between the two works are due to several factors. First, in this work, we have increased the number of simulated particles by 75% and used a slightly different weighting solution which better reflects the observed Af ρ evolution of comet 21P.…”
Section: Model I -Calibrationcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best agreement between the simulated and the observed activity profiles for the four visual showers was obtained for an ejecta size distribution index u of 2.9. This value differs from our previous published estimate of 2.64 (Egal et al, 2018); differences between the two works are due to several factors. First, in this work, we have increased the number of simulated particles by 75% and used a slightly different weighting solution which better reflects the observed Af ρ evolution of comet 21P.…”
Section: Model I -Calibrationcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Its parent body is the Jupiter-family comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner, discovered in 1900, which has an erratic and highly perturbed orbit (Marsden and Sekanina, 1971). The Draconid annual activity is usually barely perceptible (with a rate of a few visual meteors per hour), but the stream occasionally produces strong outbursts and storms (up to ten thousand meteors per hour) that are not directly correlated with the past geometrical configuration between the Earth and the parent comet (Egal et al, 2018). In addition, some showers were observed by naked-eye witnesses or using video devices, while other outbursts (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 18, the Egal et al (2018) simulations show an obvious correlation of the radiant position with the solar longitude. Our observing period spanned the solar longitudes from 195.400 696°to 195.456 238°, but the simulated radiant positions matched the observations best for λ ∼195.8°, indicating that the position of simulated particles is shifted along the orbit when compared to observations.…”
Section: Radiant Distributionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The normalized density is color coded. simulated radiants as produced by Egal et al (2018). In the simulation, the meteors were produced by meteoroids ejected in 1953, and we only selected simulations which hit the Earth in the range of solar longitude between 195°and 196°.…”
Section: Radiant Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation