The DPSIR framework in support of green infrastructure planning: A case study in Southern Italy

Spanò, Marinella; Gentile, Francesco; Davies, Celia; Lafortezza, Raffaele

doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.051

Cited by 67 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…En este se incorpora el tema impacto, referido a la evaluación cuantitativa o cualitativa de los estados de las variables objeto de estudio para poder establecer luego una prioridad en las respuestas que se adopten (Spanò, Gentile, Davies y Lafortezza, 2017).…”

Section: El Modelo Presión-estado-respuesta Y Sus Variacionesunclassified

Modelos para evaluar la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo Modelos para avaliar a sustentabilidade das organizaçõesPalavras-chave: ética empresarial, sustentabilidade empresarial, responsabilidade social empresarial. Abstract Modelos para evaluar la sostenibilidad de las organizacionesPalabras clave: ética empresarial, sostenibilidad empresarial, responsabilidad social empresarial. A natureza complexa da sustentabilidade organizacional tem desafiado pesquisadores, acadêmicos, agências e instituições internacionais na busca de um modelo. Prova disso é a grande variedade de estruturas, metodologias e métodos existentes na literatura atual. A presente pesquisa inclui o estudo dos modelos para avaliar a sustentabilidade empresarial enquadrada em princípios de desenvolvimento sustentável e teorias éticas da responsabilidade social a nível gerencial. Para alcançar o que segue, são identificadas as principais características e mudanças de cada modelo desde a sua emergência, que permite a sua classificação em três grupos, para depois identificar suas vantagens e desvantagens. ResumenKeywords: business ethics, corporate sustainability, corporate social responsibility.The complex nature of organizational sustainability has challenged researchers, scholars and international agencies and institutions when searching for a model. This is reflected in the wide variety of frameworks, methodologies and methods existing in current literature. This research study approaches the models that aim to assess enterprise sustainability relying on sustainable development principles as well as on ethical theories of social responsibility in the organizational realm. In order to achieve this goal, this paper identifies the main distinctive features and modifications introduced to each model since its emergence, which allows to classify them into three groups, and finally points out its advantages and disadvantages.La naturaleza compleja de la sostenibilidad organizacional ha desafiado a los investigadores, académicos, organismos e instituciones internacionales en la búsqueda de un modelo, muestra de esto es la gran variedad de marcos de trabajo, metodologías y métodos existentes en la literatura actual. La presente investigación abarca el estudio de los modelos para evaluar la sostenibilidad empresarial enmarcados en principios de desarrollo sostenible y teorías éticas de la responsabilidad social en el nivel empresarial. Para lograr lo anterior son identificadas las principales características distintivas y modificaciones de cada modelo desde su surgimiento, lo que permite su clasificación en tres grupos, para luego identificar sus ventajas y desventajas.

show abstract

Section: El Modelo Presión-estado-respuesta Y Sus Variacionesunclassified

Modelos para evaluar la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…DPSIR is a conceptual framework that is used to analyze the cause-effect relationship between society and the environment and to support decisions in response to environmental issues [27]. Further, the DPSIR framework considers driving forces, such as human activities, that exert pressure on the environment, leading to ecological changes [28]. LCA, on the other hand, is a comprehensive framework designed to describe activities and environmental impacts in a correlation method between the input and output [29].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Strategy-Based Model for Low Carbon Cities

Hasyimi

Azizalrahman

2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low carbon cities are increasingly forming a distinct strand of sustainability literature. Models have been developed to measure the performance of low carbon cities. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a strategy-based model to evaluate current performance and predict future conditions of low carbon cities. It examines the dynamic interrelationships between key performance indicators (KPIs), induces changes to city plan targets, and then instantly predicts the outcome of these changes. Designed to be generic and flexible, the proposed model shows how low carbon targets could be used to guide the transformation of low carbon cities under four strategies: (1) Passive intervention, (2) problem solving, (3) trend modifying, and (4) opportunity seeking. Further, the model has been applied to 17 cities and then tested on five cities: London, New York, Barcelona, Dubai, and Istanbul. The paper concludes with policy implications to realign city plans and support low carbon innovation.

show abstract

“…Ecuador's national plan for "Buen Vivir" (Quality of Life) calls for planning to environmental sustainability and introduces opportunity for the adoption of GI as evaluated for the city of Cuenca (Ecuador) (Serra-Llobet and Hermida, 2017). The Driving force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, which is a planning tool for sustainable landuse and social well-being, was applied to a case study in southern Italy for the promotion of GI adoption (Spano et al, 2017). The valuation of GI is considered through empirical studies undertaken in Sheffield (England, UK) over a 10 year period, looking at the befits of urban greening options and future development scenarios (Wild et al, 2017).…”

Section: Planning and Ecosystem Service Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%