2003
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m302114200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dps Protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Does Not Bind to DNA but Protects It toward Oxidative Cleavage

Abstract: Agrobacterium tumefaciens Dps (DNA-binding proteins from starved cells), encoded by the dps gene located on the circular chromosome of this plant pathogen, was cloned, and its structural and functional properties were determined in vitro. In Escherichia coli Dps, the family prototype, the DNA binding properties are thought to be associated with the presence of the lysine-containing N-terminal tail that extends from the protein surface into the solvent. The x-ray crystal structure of A. tumefaciens Dps shows th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
152
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the detoxification of ROS becomes particularly important under starvation conditions (32), the observed induction of ROS-removing enzymes in M. extorquens AM1 might thus be a reaction to endogenously formed ROS. On the other hand, it is well known that plant cells challenge bacteria by means of an oxidative burst (33) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and Kat and Dps have been shown to counteract the toxic effects of ROS produced by plants (34,35). All of the stress proteins that we identified appeared to be epiphytic-specific rather than phyllosphere-specific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Because the detoxification of ROS becomes particularly important under starvation conditions (32), the observed induction of ROS-removing enzymes in M. extorquens AM1 might thus be a reaction to endogenously formed ROS. On the other hand, it is well known that plant cells challenge bacteria by means of an oxidative burst (33) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and Kat and Dps have been shown to counteract the toxic effects of ROS produced by plants (34,35). All of the stress proteins that we identified appeared to be epiphytic-specific rather than phyllosphere-specific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Additional residues, histidine and tryptophan, provide another coordinated sites to make an iron center. 26,27 Histidine plays a role in the redox process in the iron binding. 27 Based on this concept, the corresponding residues and the possible binding environment were examined in HP0242.…”
Section: Fig 2 Hp0242 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferritin nanocavities form during the spontaneous assembly of ellipsoidal, polypeptide subunits (1-3), 24 in maxiferritins (Ϸ480 kDa) and 12 in miniferritins (240 kDa), also called DNA protection during starvation proteins. The biological importance of ferritin is emphasized by the lethality of ferritin gene deletion in mammals (4), defects in the CNS from mutations in humans (5), and oxidant sensitivity after deletions of the multiple ferritins in bacteria (6)(7)(8). Reactions of iron and oxygen catalyzed by maxiferritins, in cells of higher plants, animals including humans, and microorganisms, stabilize iron with oxygen at 10 14 times above the K s to match cellular iron concentrations, whereas miniferritins protect DNA by trapping oxidants with iron in the hydrated ferric oxide mineral.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of F ox sites in ferritin has been inferred to be in the center of each active subunit for maxiferritins and at junctions of subunit dimers in miniferritins, based on models of protein cocrystals with Fe 2ϩ analogues such as Mg 2ϩ or Ca 2ϩ (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Such models are reasonable for the ferrous substrate, but not for ferric intermediates such as the diferric peroxo (DFP) complex or products such as diferric oxo͞hydroxo mineral precursors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%