1963
DOI: 10.1353/cwh.1963.0049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Douglas Democracy and the Crisis of Disunion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The years leading up to, during, and following the Civil War were "years of intense anxiety, as many categories in the United States were in flux" as a result of the shattering of the slave system (De Grave 1995, 120) and of the influx of immigrants. Countless historians have talked about sectional conflict between North and South in terms of crisis: "Sectional Crisis" (Graebner 1977;Rosenberg 1971) or a Crisis of Republicanism (Ambrosius 1990), a "Crisis of Disunion" (Johannsen 1963) or Crisis of the Union (Knoles 1965), a "Constitutional Crisis" (Bestor 1964), a "Crisis of Congress" (DiNunzio 1972), even a Crisis of Fear (Channing 1970) or a "Crisis in Law and Order" (Paludan 1972). Among many others, Bowman, titling his study of the Civil War At the Precipice: Americans North and South during the Secession Crisis (2010), characterizes sectional conflict as indeed a precipice, an existential point of political life or death, for the United States and her Constitution, exploring contemporaneous Southern alongside Northern arguments for the legitimacy of their respective actions-declarations of Secession and war, respectively.…”
Section: The (Il)legitimacy Of Secessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The years leading up to, during, and following the Civil War were "years of intense anxiety, as many categories in the United States were in flux" as a result of the shattering of the slave system (De Grave 1995, 120) and of the influx of immigrants. Countless historians have talked about sectional conflict between North and South in terms of crisis: "Sectional Crisis" (Graebner 1977;Rosenberg 1971) or a Crisis of Republicanism (Ambrosius 1990), a "Crisis of Disunion" (Johannsen 1963) or Crisis of the Union (Knoles 1965), a "Constitutional Crisis" (Bestor 1964), a "Crisis of Congress" (DiNunzio 1972), even a Crisis of Fear (Channing 1970) or a "Crisis in Law and Order" (Paludan 1972). Among many others, Bowman, titling his study of the Civil War At the Precipice: Americans North and South during the Secession Crisis (2010), characterizes sectional conflict as indeed a precipice, an existential point of political life or death, for the United States and her Constitution, exploring contemporaneous Southern alongside Northern arguments for the legitimacy of their respective actions-declarations of Secession and war, respectively.…”
Section: The (Il)legitimacy Of Secessionmentioning
confidence: 99%