2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The doubly eclipsing quintuple low-mass star system 1SWASP J093010.78+533859.5

Abstract: Our discovery of 1SWASP J093010.78+533859.5 as a probable doubly eclipsing quadruple system, containing a contact binary with P ∼ 0.23 d and a detached binary with P ∼ 1.31 d, was announced in 2013. Subsequently, Koo and collaborators confirmed the detached binary spectroscopically, and identified a fifth set of static spectral lines at its location, corresponding to an additional noneclipsing component of the system. Here we present new spectroscopic and photometric observations, allowing confirmation of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R 2 is perhaps rather large and hence log L L is rather high for an O hypergiant secondary: comparable single stars studied in Martins et al (2008) (F10 and F15) are modelled as having radii ∼30 R . However, an inflated secondary radius is expected in lower-mass contact binaries due to the shared envelope (Lohr et al 2015), and a comparable mechanism may be in operation here.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…R 2 is perhaps rather large and hence log L L is rather high for an O hypergiant secondary: comparable single stars studied in Martins et al (2008) (F10 and F15) are modelled as having radii ∼30 R . However, an inflated secondary radius is expected in lower-mass contact binaries due to the shared envelope (Lohr et al 2015), and a comparable mechanism may be in operation here.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The possibility of a third body in J200059 could not be excluded due to the low quality of the O-C diagram, although Lohr et al (2013a) did not detect any evidence for period change in J200059. In fact, another system, 1SWASP J093010.78+533859.5 which had been not found period variations by Lohr et al (2013b) either, could be a multiple system (Koo et al 2014;Lohr et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this second binary is also eclipsing (although the eclipses are very shallow), and both systems orbit a common center of mass with the 16-year period inferred earlier from the light-travel time effect. Such quadruple, doubly-eclipsing systems are relatively rare, though several have been discovered in recent years based on the high-precision and nearly uninterrupted observations collected between 2009 and 2013 by NASA's Kepler spacecraft, as well as from ground-based surveys (see, e.g., Pawlak et al 2013;Koo et al 2014;Lohr et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%