1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.531500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The doublet representation of non-Hilbert eigenstates of the Hamiltonian

Abstract: We find the minimal mathematical structure to represent quantum eigenstates with complex eigenvalues with no need of analytic continuation. These eigenvectors build doublets in non-Hilbert spaces. We construct exact solutions for the Friedrichs model that continuously join the ones of the free Hamiltonian. We extend the Wigner operator to these non-Hilbert spaces and enlarge the concept of normalized vectors via the definition of the doublets. Making use of these doublets, we describe systems whose states have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-A more general mathematical structure (doublets) to represent Gamov vectors is proposed in reference [11] The results presented in the previous subsection can be compared with the ones of references [6] and [8] if we define:…”
Section: Generalized Expansions In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…-A more general mathematical structure (doublets) to represent Gamov vectors is proposed in reference [11] The results presented in the previous subsection can be compared with the ones of references [6] and [8] if we define:…”
Section: Generalized Expansions In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case we have lost the particle number operator corresponding to the discrete part of the spectrum of H and we do not have the correct form of H when λ → 0 [30]. This problem can be solved promoting the energy (or frequency) ω to be a complex variable z.…”
Section: Continuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see also [38] and paper [34], where the Nakanishi trick is explain). From its own definition it is evident that |n− >, |z− >, | ω− >∈ φ × −,out , since these vectors are functionals over |ϕ >∈ φ −,out and that |n+ >, |z+ >, | ω+ >∈ φ × +,in since these vectors are functionals over |ψ >∈ φ +,in .…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%