1984
DOI: 10.5006/1.3581921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Double Loop Reactivation Method for Detecting Sensitization in AISI 304 Stainless Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
112
0
13

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
112
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The % DOS was then computed as the ratio of (Ir/Ia) x100. 18,19) EPMA line scans of two samples each from both the steels was performed in conjunction with SEM using JEOL 8 600 M Electron Probe Micro analyzer. The line scan determines the chemical composition of the alloying elements across the grain boundaries.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The % DOS was then computed as the ratio of (Ir/Ia) x100. 18,19) EPMA line scans of two samples each from both the steels was performed in conjunction with SEM using JEOL 8 600 M Electron Probe Micro analyzer. The line scan determines the chemical composition of the alloying elements across the grain boundaries.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of the reactivation current (I r ) to the activation current (I a ) peaks, I r =I a , was taken as the DOS. 10) The potential values reported in this work are referred to the SCE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DOS in ASS's is commonly assessed by the Double Loop Electrochemical Potentiokinetic Reactivation test (DL-EPR), which is a quantitative and reliable method with excellent reproducibility. 10,11) A potentiostat/galvanostat was used with a conventional three electrodes electrochemical cell; a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as reference electrode, a graphite bar as auxiliary electrode and the ASS samples as working electrode. The DL-EPR tests were conducted in 0.5M H 2 SO 4 + 0.01M KSCN solution at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modi cations to the conventional DL-EPR test have been made in the electrolyte depending on the type of alloy, but the most common depassivator or activator in the dissolution of metals is potassium thiocyanate. This compound is used due to its catalytic effect in diluted solutions containing sulfuric acid, because potassium thiocyanate promotes the dissolution of the passive layer in chromium depleted zones, increasing the current density during the anodic dissolution in the activation process and subsequently along the grain boundaries during the reactivation loop 12) . It is established that a disproportionate reaction of the decomposition of potassium thiocyanate takes place producing the adsorption of S in the surface of the sample, which is stable in the potential range of anodic dissolution, where S compounds are reduced according to the reaction…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%