“…The tensions I have pointed to above concern the following five themes: (1) the relation between action and sense making, (2) what should be considered the proper object of knowledge: one's action patterns ), one's biography (Alheit & Dausien, 2002), or the relation between oneself and the social world (Alheit, 1994), (3) whether the learning process is characterized by people actively and consciously reflecting on their lives or whether the learning process rather is dependent on serendipity, chance, and self-regulation, which imagines a more passive learner, (4) whether the concept should focus on discourse or experience, and (5) a possibly over-optimistic character of biographical learning, a belief that stories can 'change structures'. Besides these tensions, there are reasons to discuss critically the idea regarding the occurrence of general conceptions of one's biography, as well as the idea of narrative coherence that is present in the biographical learning tradition.…”