2009
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2009.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
267
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
5
267
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reus, Lamont and Ellis measured "functional integration" 9 with six survey items gauging "the extent to which key functional areas of the acquired firm were integrated with those of the acquirer" (2016: 938). However, they found no direct effect on performance, using the same composite performance measure as Reus and Lamont (2009).…”
Section: Interaction and Communication Studies Focusing On Interactimentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Reus, Lamont and Ellis measured "functional integration" 9 with six survey items gauging "the extent to which key functional areas of the acquired firm were integrated with those of the acquirer" (2016: 938). However, they found no direct effect on performance, using the same composite performance measure as Reus and Lamont (2009).…”
Section: Interaction and Communication Studies Focusing On Interactimentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with this line of reasoning, several studies have found evidence that MNEs may obtain better performance in distant markets (e.g., Evans & Mavondo, 2002;Magnusson, Schuster, & Taras, 2014). These and other studies suggest that cultural differences, which tend to be more salient in business transactions across greater distances, may lead the individuals, groups and organizations involved in these transactions to pay greater attention to cultural sensitivities and be better prepared to navigate the cultural quagmires in the context of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (Björkman, Stahl, & Vaara, 2007;Reus & Lamont, 2009;Stahl & Voigt, 2008). A study by Schomaker and Zaheer (2014) found that knowledge understanding was higher across units in more linguistically distant locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Competition among multiple potential control buyers can generate a high premium for the stocks of the acquiree (Capron & Pistre, 2002), management inefficiency concerning companies' post-acquisition context (Reus & Lamont, 2009), and, finally, the different metrics used to assess performance could be one of the explanations for these disagreements (Zollo & Meier, 2008).…”
Section: Financial Performance In Mergers and Acquisitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, the focus moved to the resource-based view and the organizational learning perspective (Barkema & Vermeulen, 1998). Institutional-and sociocultural-based theories, which analyze the impact of cultural distance, regulatory differences, and institutional contingencies on corporate restructuring events, are increasingly numerous nowadays (Dikova, Sahib, & Witteloostuijn, 2010;Gubbi, Aulakh, Ray, Sarkar, & Chittoor, 2010;Lin, Peng, Yang, & Sun, 2009;Nadolska & Barkema, 2007;Reus & Lamont, 2009), as more traditional analyses focusing on financial-economic and market aspects have proved insufficient to apprehend the entire complexity inherent to a cross-border acquisition (King, Dalton, Daily, & Covin, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%