1993
DOI: 10.2307/281966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dorset-Thule Succession in Arctic North America: Assessing Claims for Culture Contact

Abstract: Most Arctic archaeologists believe that the people of the Thule culture, who arrived in the eastern Arctic approximately 1,000 years ago, met people of the Dorset culture and acquired important knowledge from them while replacing them in this region. The most convincing indication for technology transfer comes from the Thule adoption of Dorset harpoon-head styles. However, a review of radiocarbon dates, artifact styles, and site data reveals no conclusive evidence for face-to-face contact between the people of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New series of radiocarbon dates suggest temporal overlap between the Dorset and the Thule that lasted between 50 and 200 years, with geographical coexistence in some areas (14,16,(71)(72)(73)(74)(75), whereas an earlier reassessment of the eastern Arctic radiocarbon dates suggested that Dorset had disappeared from the eastern Arctic more than 200 years prior to Thule entering the eastern Arctic and thus the two groups never met (12,76). Although we cannot preclude later gene flow between the Dorset and the Thule (that is, subsequent to the more ancient gene flow that occurred at least 4000 years ago), the contrasting genetic and cultural affinities of the Sadlermiut individuals present a conundrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New series of radiocarbon dates suggest temporal overlap between the Dorset and the Thule that lasted between 50 and 200 years, with geographical coexistence in some areas (14,16,(71)(72)(73)(74)(75), whereas an earlier reassessment of the eastern Arctic radiocarbon dates suggested that Dorset had disappeared from the eastern Arctic more than 200 years prior to Thule entering the eastern Arctic and thus the two groups never met (12,76). Although we cannot preclude later gene flow between the Dorset and the Thule (that is, subsequent to the more ancient gene flow that occurred at least 4000 years ago), the contrasting genetic and cultural affinities of the Sadlermiut individuals present a conundrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dorset culture is divided into three phases: (i) Early Dorset,~800 BCE to 0 BCE/CE; (ii) Middle Dorset,~0 BCE/CE to 600 to 800 CE; and (iii) Late Dorset~600 to 800 CE to 1300 CE (9). The Paleo-Eskimo tradition in the eastern Arctic ended sometime between 1150 to 1350 CE, shortly after the sudden appearance of the Neo-Eskimo Thule whale-hunters from the Bering Strait region (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of his thesis is that one of the "parallel traditions" derived from contact between people of the Thule and Dorset cultures. I have elsewhere argued that the preponderance of evidence, including harpoon head styles and radiocarbon dates, does not provide convincing proof for such culture contact (Park, 1993). There is no need to repeat those arguments here, but I am no longer alone in questioning at least some of the commonly cited evidence for DorsetThule contact (Kleivan, 1996).…”
Section: Robert Fortuinementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, at Diana Bay and elsewhere in Nunavik, Thule Inuit campsites frequently map onto Dorset sites, which can obscure archaeological interpretations. Dorset artifacts are often recovered from Thule Inuit house contexts, but their presence more likely indicates the use of sod recovered from Dorset dwellings-either adjacent or underlying-in the construction of Thule Inuit semisubterranean houses, rather than a simultaneous occupation of the site by the two cultural groups (Park, 1993;Lofthouse, 2003Lofthouse, , 2007Arsenault and Gendron, 2007;Pinard and Gendron, 2009).…”
Section: The Physical Evolution Of the Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, while archaeological studies such as McGhee (2000) and Friesen (2004) proposed a temporal overlap between the Dorset and the Thule people, other scholars (e.g., Park, 1993Park, , 2000Pinard and Gendron, 2009) have suggested that the Dorset people had disappeared from the eastern Arctic prior to the arrival of the Thule. The latter scenario seems to be supported by a recent study involving paleogenetic data (Raghavan et al, 2014), which identified two separate migration pulses from Siberia across the New World Arctic: the initial Paleoeskimo movement, followed later by a separate Thule migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%