1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700048066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Doppelgänger, disintegration and death: a case report

Abstract: SynopsisThe phenomenon of a Doppelgänger (the double autoscopy; heautoscopy) and its resolution in a psychotic patient is presented. A comparison is made between this experience and the phenomenon as it is described and defined in the literature. The themes of death and disintegration so commonly associated with the Doppelgänger in folklore and literature are highlighted by this patient's experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Jaspers, the Doppelgdnger was not a unitary phenomenon, but rather one able to take on different forms: it could, for example, be part of a delusional or part of an hallucinatory type of heautoscopy and so on. This contrasts sharply with the formal concept of the Doppelgdnger recently defined by Maack & Muller (1983) for in Jasperian psychopathological terms their Doppelgdnger actually seems to be a combination of a disturbance of the awareness of the unity of the ^e//with an autoscopic hallucination.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…According to Jaspers, the Doppelgdnger was not a unitary phenomenon, but rather one able to take on different forms: it could, for example, be part of a delusional or part of an hallucinatory type of heautoscopy and so on. This contrasts sharply with the formal concept of the Doppelgdnger recently defined by Maack & Muller (1983) for in Jasperian psychopathological terms their Doppelgdnger actually seems to be a combination of a disturbance of the awareness of the unity of the ^e//with an autoscopic hallucination.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…For instance, we excluded many previously reported cases, who were actually not AP (see also [11,21,31]), but non-visual body schema disturbances such as the convincing feeling that there is another person close by without actually seeing that person. This phenomenon has been called ''leibhafte Bewusstheit'' [56], ''hallucination du compagnon'' [62] or ''feeling of a presence'' [10,21] [51,57,68,71,72,79,91]). Accordingly, we also excluded cases of AP due to migraine, hysteria, narcolepsy, cataplexy, confuso-oniric states, or of hypnagogic origin as well as AP-cases of non-focal or generalized neurological origin ( [50, #78], [32, #3, #5, #7]).…”
Section: Included Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might imagine, as we sketched in the introduction, that perceiving the avatar as actively mimicking the participant’s actions would make it necessarily related to the task, as opposed to, as in the static case, an accidental bystander. Consequently, a change in the mirror image could constitute a particularly disrupting, if not disturbing event: after all, such an imaginary change in self-perception is a classic motif in horror stories ( Dietrich, 1992 ) and a symptom in psychiatry ( Maack and Mullen, 1983 ). Whether frightful or merely task-relevant, the predicted effect of avatar changes should from this perspective be larger in animated than in static conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%