2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7742(05)63005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dopamine Hypothesis of Drug Addiction: Hypodopaminergic State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
184
2
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 421 publications
17
184
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, GC are known to modulate the reinforcing properties of drugs and, in fact, have positive reinforcing properties of their own (43). Adding a new perspective, the present study demonstrates that iuGC triggers an impoverishment in DAergic inputs and DA levels in the NAcc, leading to increased drug-seeking behavior in adulthood; notably, hypoDAergic status is an hallmark of the "addicted brain" (44,45). Associated with their lower intra-NAcc levels of DA, animals exposed to prenatal GC expressed more Drd2 in the NAcc, potentially indicating a compensatory mechanism in this structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Specifically, GC are known to modulate the reinforcing properties of drugs and, in fact, have positive reinforcing properties of their own (43). Adding a new perspective, the present study demonstrates that iuGC triggers an impoverishment in DAergic inputs and DA levels in the NAcc, leading to increased drug-seeking behavior in adulthood; notably, hypoDAergic status is an hallmark of the "addicted brain" (44,45). Associated with their lower intra-NAcc levels of DA, animals exposed to prenatal GC expressed more Drd2 in the NAcc, potentially indicating a compensatory mechanism in this structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In line with these observations, a marked reduction in VTA dopamine neuron activity has been reported in ethanol-withdrawn animals (Diana et al, 1993(Diana et al, , 1996. This 'hypodopaminergic state', which can be reversed by administration of ethanol itself (Diana et al, 1993;Weiss et al, 1996), may, at least partially, contribute to the emotional/motivational component of ethanol withdrawal symptoms, such as dysphoria and anhedonia (Koob and Volkow, 2010;Melis et al, 2005;Trevisan et al, 1998). However, the cellular mechanisms underlying the hypoactivity of dopamine neurons after ethanol withdrawal remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The hypodopaminergic state observed in ethanol-withdrawn animals or in detoxified alcoholics is characterized by hypoactivity of dopamine neurons and the resulting decrease in dopamine release in the NAc and striatum, together with downregulation of postsynaptic D 2 receptors in those dopamine projection areas (Martinez et al, 2005;Melis et al, 2005;Volkow et al, 2007). It has been postulated that this hypodopaminergic state contributes to the emotional/motivational component of ethanol dependence, although activation of other neurotransmitter systems, such as those involving corticotropin-releasing factor or the endogenous k-opioid dynorphin, has also been implicated (Koob, 2009;Wee and Koob, 2010).…”
Section: Enhanced D 2 Autoinhibition and Hypodopaminergic State Durinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple lines of evidence that cocaine dependence is associated with a decrease in D 2 receptor binding [164-167], a pattern that seems to persist after disease remission [165]. Decreases in D 2 receptor binding have also been found in heroin addiction [168], alcohol dependence [169,170], methamphetamine abuse [171,172], prompting a number of researchers to posit that low D 2 receptor availability may serve as a biomarker for substance abuse, potentially reflecting an altered sensitivity to various rewards [173-175]. Although these molecular-imaging studies suggest decreased reward motivation in addiction that is consistent with the ‘reward-deficiency syndrome’ hypothesis of addiction, functional brain-activation studies paint a less consistent picture, probably due to variability in samples, task demands, patient characteristics, and unknown effects of a history of addictive behavior on functional responses to reward stimuli.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%