2008
DOI: 10.1177/1465116508095150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Domestic Opportunity Structure and Supranational Activity

Abstract: This study examines when and why environmental non-governmental organizations in the United Kingdom, France and Germany bypass national-level activity in favor of supranational action. Data are gathered from a content analysis of news wires and analyzed in a series of logistic equations. Evidence supports the multi-level governance theory of European Union integration. Examining political opportunity structure explanations for activity, I find that changes in domestic elite alliances and electoral cleavages he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similarly compensatory—if inverted—dynamic is also evident in the EU. Societal groups who feel their demands are unheeded at the member state level have deliberately sought to bypass that level and engage EU actors instead (Corbett & Watson, 2012; Poloni‐Staudinger, 2008). In both multilevel systems, actors at lower levels can try to shape and even “upload” ideas subsequently spread across either Europe (see Andersen & Liefferink, 1997) or the United States (see Posner, 2010).…”
Section: Context: Mobilization In Multilevel Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similarly compensatory—if inverted—dynamic is also evident in the EU. Societal groups who feel their demands are unheeded at the member state level have deliberately sought to bypass that level and engage EU actors instead (Corbett & Watson, 2012; Poloni‐Staudinger, 2008). In both multilevel systems, actors at lower levels can try to shape and even “upload” ideas subsequently spread across either Europe (see Andersen & Liefferink, 1997) or the United States (see Posner, 2010).…”
Section: Context: Mobilization In Multilevel Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%