1987
DOI: 10.1080/00236568700890011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The domestic balance of power: Relations between mistress and maid in nineteenth-century new England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The personalized and individual nature of these employment relationships encourages nannies to casually voice dissatisfaction with their positions. Since both parties are likely to be women, and the workplace is a private home or domestic sphere-a feminine-coded space in the United States, dating to Victorian era "angel in the home" constructions of domesticity-nannies express criticism of their working conditions in terms of their women employers' gendered failures (Lasser 1987). In my research, nannies exclusively leveled complaints at their female employers, even in cases where they knew their male employers as well, reflecting the persistence of the sexual division of home-based labor, encompassing paid as well as unpaid caregiving responsibilities (Orloff 1993).…”
Section: Isolated Workites and Gendered Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The personalized and individual nature of these employment relationships encourages nannies to casually voice dissatisfaction with their positions. Since both parties are likely to be women, and the workplace is a private home or domestic sphere-a feminine-coded space in the United States, dating to Victorian era "angel in the home" constructions of domesticity-nannies express criticism of their working conditions in terms of their women employers' gendered failures (Lasser 1987). In my research, nannies exclusively leveled complaints at their female employers, even in cases where they knew their male employers as well, reflecting the persistence of the sexual division of home-based labor, encompassing paid as well as unpaid caregiving responsibilities (Orloff 1993).…”
Section: Isolated Workites and Gendered Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attentive to this shift, scholars have highlighted how the sector's affective aspects extract surplus emotional labor from women workers (Hochschild ). Domestic workers, in turn, often justify or manage their caregiving labor through expressions of sentiment and kin obligation (Ally ; Colen , ; Hondagneu‐Sotelo ; Kleinman ; Lan ; Lasser ; Parreñas , ; Stacey ). Over the past few decades, ethnographies of paid household labor have demonstrated how discourses of intimacy, personalism, and fictive kin relationships inure women to degraded working conditions while obfuscating race‐based labor segmentation and ongoing discrimination (Chang ; Lan ; Nadasen ; Rollins ; Romero ).…”
Section: Domestic and Care Work Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the United States suggests that servants' earnings compared favorably with the earnings of other unskilled or semiskilled workers in the late nineteenth century, especially since room and board were provided; that any discontent among servants was not related to wage levels; and that even when servants' earnings were higher than earnings in other occupations, women shunned domestic service for noneconomic reasons (Katzman 1978: 303-14;Sutherland 1981: 109-10;Lasser 1987). For England, Teresa M. McBride (1976: 64) concludes that domestic service had a distinct monetary advantage over other occupations for women in the nineteenth century; that servants were doing comparatively well even in the early twentieth century; and that despite relatively good earnings, the long-term decline began after the peak in employment in 1891 (see also Schwarz 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%