1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-577x(94)90132-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The domain structure of LaNbO4 in the low temperature monoclinic phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between lattice fringes was determined to be 2.53(1) Å of the (002) plane and 2.67(1) Å of the (200) plane of domain I and domain II , respectively. The results are consistent with the prototype phase change (4/ m to 2/ m ) in rare-earth niobate compounds with M-fergusonite structure. The SAED patterns were then collected over area 1 (domain I only) and 2 (domain I and domain II ) for further structural information. The SAED pattern of area 1 shows the single-crystal feature along the (010) direction, and the SAED pattern over the boundary area depicts the overlapped patterns along the (010) direction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The distance between lattice fringes was determined to be 2.53(1) Å of the (002) plane and 2.67(1) Å of the (200) plane of domain I and domain II , respectively. The results are consistent with the prototype phase change (4/ m to 2/ m ) in rare-earth niobate compounds with M-fergusonite structure. The SAED patterns were then collected over area 1 (domain I only) and 2 (domain I and domain II ) for further structural information. The SAED pattern of area 1 shows the single-crystal feature along the (010) direction, and the SAED pattern over the boundary area depicts the overlapped patterns along the (010) direction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These preparation temperatures are well above the phase transition point, inevitably resulting in twin formation from multiple ferroelastic domains induced as the material cools through the phase transition. Since the crystals in the present study were grown near the phase transition regime, we surmise that the hydrothermal conditions facilitate the growth of the C 2/ c fergusonite-type phase as bulk crystals with much larger single crystalline domains. Indeed this proved to be the case as the previously reported twinned crystals had domains on the order of tens or hundreds of nanometers, while the crystals grown in this study showed no evidence of significant twin domains over the order of tens to hundreds of microns in the single crystal diffraction studies. Reflection profiles from single crystal diffraction were Gaussian and symmetrical (Figure ), and exhibited narrow peak widths consistent with low mosaicity (fwhm values generally in the range of 0.25–0.45 deg for a 0.1 degree scan width in 2θ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This often precludes high quality structural refinements or causes significant areas of electron density to remain present in the difference electron density maps. Since these microdomains are of a ferroelastic nature they received a great deal of detailed study at the nanoscopic regime. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domains arise as a result of the second-order ferroelastic phase transition from the scheelite (4/ m ) to fergusonite (2/ m ) structure. Alternate domains are described by different orientations (I and II) in the monoclinic fergusonite phase, ,, as illustrated in the adjacent [010] m selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure b). Each alternate domain has a 94.8° rotation, equivalent to the monoclinic β angle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%