1946
DOI: 10.1177/004057364600300309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Doctrine of the Trinity and the Unity of the Church

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tension is no more evident than in H. Richard Niebuhr's quasi‐Trinitarian ethic that sets the two Testaments against one another by pitting the ethics of the Father and Spirit against that of the Son. He does so by identifying a Christological ethic of love that applies only in limited Christian contexts, a pneumatological ethic of experience that informs ecclesial ethics in wider contexts, and a creational ethic rooted in God the Father that is more general and applicable to all people everywhere (Niebuhr 1951, 114, 131; 1946, 371–84). Likewise, his brother Reinhold distinguishes between a notion of justice that is rooted in creation and binding upon all persons and an agape ethic that is revealed in the cross of Christ and cannot realistically be deemed normative in a fallen world (Niebuhr 1932, 51–82, 257–77; 1956, 43–62; and 1986, 102–22).…”
Section: Why the Politics Of Jesus Needs A Prequelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tension is no more evident than in H. Richard Niebuhr's quasi‐Trinitarian ethic that sets the two Testaments against one another by pitting the ethics of the Father and Spirit against that of the Son. He does so by identifying a Christological ethic of love that applies only in limited Christian contexts, a pneumatological ethic of experience that informs ecclesial ethics in wider contexts, and a creational ethic rooted in God the Father that is more general and applicable to all people everywhere (Niebuhr 1951, 114, 131; 1946, 371–84). Likewise, his brother Reinhold distinguishes between a notion of justice that is rooted in creation and binding upon all persons and an agape ethic that is revealed in the cross of Christ and cannot realistically be deemed normative in a fallen world (Niebuhr 1932, 51–82, 257–77; 1956, 43–62; and 1986, 102–22).…”
Section: Why the Politics Of Jesus Needs A Prequelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can construe the doctrine as a rule for avoiding reductive and excessive emphases on one or another of the modes or “persons” in Christian thinking and discourse about God and God's way with the world. H. Richard Niebuhr deploys the doctrine in this way (see H. R. Niebuhr 1996). Reinhold Niebuhr need see no reason not to endorse this approach to it.…”
Section: Concerning Reinhold Niebuhr's Theologymentioning
confidence: 99%