The Doctor–Nurse Game Revisited

Stein, Leonard I.; Watts, David; Howell, Timothy

doi:10.1056/nejm199002223220810

Cited by 326 publications

(200 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

189

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other qualitative studies have indicated a range of more problematic experiences of nurse-physician collaboration, and how this is part of a wider historical system of power dynamics within which the physician maintains higher status and authority (Corser, 2000;Greenfield, 1999;Stein, 1967), which is enduring (Reeves, Nelson, & Zwarenstein, 2008;Stein, Watts, & Howell, 1990;Stein-Parbury & Liaschenko, 2007). An interview study of medical residents, for example, found that their perceptions toward nurses were consistent with nurses' experiences of being viewed in a mechanistic way, i.e., as a tool to carry out physicians' orders rather than as a professional with an expertise (Weinberg, Miner, & Rivilin, 2009).…”

Section: Implications For Interprofessional Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Nurse–Physician Collaboration in General Internal Medicine: A Synthesis of Survey and Ethnographic Techniques

Conn¹,

Kenaszchuk²,

Dainty³

et al. 2014

Health and Interprofessional Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Effective collaboration between hospital nurses and physicians is associated with patient safety, quality of care, and provider satisfaction. Mutual nurse-physician perceptions of one another's collaboration are typically discrepant. Quantitative and qualitative studies frequently conclude that nurses experience lower satisfaction with nurse-physician collaboration than physicians. Mixed methods studies of nurse-physician collaboration are uncommon; results from one of the two approaches are seldom related to or reported in terms of the others. This paper aims to demonstrate the complementarity of quantitative and qualitative methods for understanding nursephysician collaboration.

show abstract

Section: Implications For Interprofessional Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Nurse–Physician Collaboration in General Internal Medicine: A Synthesis of Survey and Ethnographic Techniques

Conn¹,

Kenaszchuk²,

Dainty³

et al. 2014

Health and Interprofessional Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this relationship, the nurse was permitted to indirectly suggest changes or modifications in a patient's treatment or care plan but only if proper deference was shown to the physician and if nurses maintained their subordinate position. 28 These Dr-Nurse Game relationships were assessed through observation and a compilation of anecdotes; they were not measured as such. A second, frequently described type was abusivehostile-adversarial nurse-physician relationships.…”

Section: Types and Measurement Of Nurse-physician Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nurse-Physician Relationships in Hospitals: 20 000 Nurses Tell Their Story

Schmalenberg¹,

Kramer²

2009

Critical Care Nurse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Throughout the 1990s, a great deal was written about the importance of "good" nurse-physician relationships, about how high-quality nurse-physician relationships were 1 of the 3 cornerstones of excellent (magnetic) work environments, about how the quality of nursephysician relationships is more of a concern to nurses than to physicians, and about how physicians consistently rate the quality of these relationships higher than do nurses. [18][19][20][21] In all of these writings, what constitutes good or high-quality relationships between physicians and nurses is seldom defined, and when an attempt is made to assess goodness, nurse-physician relationships are measured as though all interactions between nurses and physicians on

show abstract

“…More than twenty years later, Stein and two of his colleagues revisited doctor -nurse team work and conclude that nurses now have a different role (Stein et al, 1990). Nurses have become more autonomous health professionals, with well defined areas of expertise, and nursing has increasingly become an associated science to medicine.…”

Section: Jel Classification: I19 D82 10mentioning

confidence: 99%

Doctor-nurse teams, incentives and behavior

Tavares

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A navegação consulta e descarregamento dos títulos inseridos nas Bibliotecas Digitais UC Digitalis, UC Pombalina e UC Impactum, pressupõem a aceitação plena e sem reservas dos Termos e Condições de Uso destas Bibliotecas Digitais, disponíveis em https://digitalis.uc.pt/pt-pt/termos.Conforme exposto nos referidos Termos e Condições de Uso, o descarregamento de títulos de acesso restrito requer uma licença válida de autorização devendo o utilizador aceder ao(s) documento(s) a partir de um endereço de IP da instituição detentora da supramencionada licença.Ao utilizador é apenas permitido o descarregamento para uso pessoal, pelo que o emprego do(s) título(s) descarregado(s) para outro fim, designadamente comercial, carece de autorização do respetivo autor ou editor da obra.Na medida em que todas as obras da UC Digitalis se encontram protegidas pelo Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos e demais legislação aplicável, toda a cópia, parcial ou total, deste documento, nos casos em que é legalmente admitida, deverá conter ou fazer-se acompanhar por este aviso. Doctornurse teams, incentives and behavior Autor(es):Tavares, Aida Isabel

show abstract

The Doctor–Nurse Game Revisited

Cited by 326 publications

References 13 publications

Nurse–Physician Collaboration in General Internal Medicine: A Synthesis of Survey and Ethnographic Techniques

Nurse–Physician Collaboration in General Internal Medicine: A Synthesis of Survey and Ethnographic Techniques

Nurse-Physician Relationships in Hospitals: 20 000 Nurses Tell Their Story

Doctor-nurse teams, incentives and behavior

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About