2010
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DNA damage response: Balancing the scale between cancer and ageing

Abstract: Defects in the DNA damage response often lead to an increased susceptibility to cancer, and so the DDR presents an interesting set of novel therapeutic targets. The maintenance of genomic integrity by the DDR has also been found to be involved in the process of organismal ageing. While the removal of cells containing damaged DNA can be beneficial in the prevention of cancer, it may contribute to both normal and pathological ageing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,28,29 The 'comet assay' has been used extensively as a sensitive measurement of DNA damage in cells. 30,31 Therefore, we next performed the comet assay to detect any nuclear DNA lesions induced by chronic stress, especially in Leydig cells.…”
Section: Chronic Stress Promotes Lipofuscin Deposition In Leydig Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18,28,29 The 'comet assay' has been used extensively as a sensitive measurement of DNA damage in cells. 30,31 Therefore, we next performed the comet assay to detect any nuclear DNA lesions induced by chronic stress, especially in Leydig cells.…”
Section: Chronic Stress Promotes Lipofuscin Deposition In Leydig Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] DNA is particularly susceptible to be damaged by ROS or other stresses, such as ionizing radiation and ultraviolet light; if effective repair mechanisms fail or are absent, the accumulation of DNA damage can trigger genomic instability and cellular senescence. 18 To confirm the hypothesis that chronic stress may accelerate the ageing process in Leydig cells and to examine the mechanisms underlying stress-induced ageing in Leydig cells, adult male Brown Norway (BN) rats were subjected to chronic unpredictable stress. Rat Leydig cells were then assessed for morphological alterations and lipofuscin accumulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genome repair pathways also communicate with processes involved in induction of senescence and apoptosis when the damage cannot be repaired. Carefully balanced signalling cascades and regulatory systems are implicated in the maintenance of healthy cell survival in order to unfavour tumorigenesis and maintain stem and progenitor cells for renewal (anti-ageing) (Seviour & Lin 2010). Therefore, an effectively repaired genome is crucial not only for cancer prevention but also for lifespan extension.…”
Section: Consequences Of Genomic Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been shown in a mouse model to result from an accumulation of neurons harboring genomic damage, due to the inability of the mutant ATM protein to stimulate the p53 apoptotic cascade. Chk2 has also been shown to regulate apoptosis in a p53-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo in response to DNA damage (Seviour & Lin, 2010). Notably, the major recombinase of HR, Rad51, seems also to interact with p53, possibly serving as a tool for monitoring the extension as well the effectiveness of DNA repair processes (Henning & Sturzbecher Toxicology, 2003;Morita et al, 2010).…”
Section: Apoptosis and Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to stabilize stalled forks can lead to replisome dissociation and fork degradation or collapse. DNA damage response (DDR) pathways maintain genomic integrity by rectifying or protecting stalled or collapsed forks and regulating DNA repair (9)(10)(11). In humans, accumulation of the ssDNA-binding protein Replication Protein A (RPA) at stalled forks signals recruitment of the S-phase checkpoint kinase ATR (12)(13)(14)(15), consequently triggering recruitment of proteins that promote sister chromatid cohesion and stabilize the histone/chromatin structure (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%