2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4573(02)00096-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diversity-based approach to open-domain text summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst domain-restricted text summarization (Reeve et al, 2007;Ando et al, 2005) is easier due to the prominence of topics in the homogeneous document collection, open domain text summarization (Nomoto and Matsumoto, 2003) is more challenging, which is topped by the text expression variation challenges.…”
Section: Text Summarization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst domain-restricted text summarization (Reeve et al, 2007;Ando et al, 2005) is easier due to the prominence of topics in the homogeneous document collection, open domain text summarization (Nomoto and Matsumoto, 2003) is more challenging, which is topped by the text expression variation challenges.…”
Section: Text Summarization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, various authors have argued that incorporating sentence clustering into extractive multi-document summarization helps avoid problems of content overlap, leading to better coverage [31,55]. In [48], the clustering it is used as an effective tool for finding the diversity among the sentences. This work firstly clusters the sentences and uses the obtained sentence clusters to generate a summary.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its ability to automatically group similar textual objects together enables one to discover hidden similarity and key concepts, as well as to summarize a large amount of text into a small number of groups [14]. In [15], the clustering is used as an effective tool for finding the diversity among the sentences. This work firstly clusters the sentences and uses the obtained sentence clusters to generate a summary.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n} into the interval (0, 1), which is equivalent to the interval of a probability function. After such transformation from the real-coded representation (15) we obtain the binary-coded representation, x p,i (t) ∈ {0, 1}, where the x p,i (t) = 1 indicates that the ith sentence is selected to be included to the summary, otherwise, the ith sentence will not be selected. For example, the individual X p (t) = [1, 0, 0, 1, 1] represents a candidate solution that first, fourth, and fifth sentences are selected to be included to the summary.…”
Section: Binarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%