2012
DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2012.728570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diverse Geographies of Studentification: Living Alongside PeopleNotLike Us

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
117
1
16

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
117
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as opposed to gentrification, studentification does not necessarily lead to a long-term upgrading of neighbourhoods; the initial upgrading process can often be followed by downgrading. Moreover, studentification can further reinforce marginality and the negative image of a neighbourhood, strengthening already existing problems (Sage, J. et al 2012a). The motivations of the actors of gentrification and studentification are also different; students' housing decisions are normally based on consumption and leisure preferences rather than the exploitation of rent gap.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as opposed to gentrification, studentification does not necessarily lead to a long-term upgrading of neighbourhoods; the initial upgrading process can often be followed by downgrading. Moreover, studentification can further reinforce marginality and the negative image of a neighbourhood, strengthening already existing problems (Sage, J. et al 2012a). The motivations of the actors of gentrification and studentification are also different; students' housing decisions are normally based on consumption and leisure preferences rather than the exploitation of rent gap.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While more conventional housing conversions that see homes become de facto multioccupancy student residences are important to account for, especially in considerations of conflict and uneven social geography (Sage, Smith, & Hubbard, 2012), new-build projects are an increasingly visible phenomenon in the United Kingdom and the United States. Because these developments are often sited on brownfields or otherwise vacant or underutilized land, proponents argue that the existing social ecology and demographic composition of host communities remain largely intact.…”
Section: Housing and Higher Education In The United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), impacts on community cohesion and lifestyles (Chatterton ; Duke‐Williams ; Holton and Riley ; Kenyon ; Sage et al. ), and processes of gentrification and revitalization (Melfi ; Smith and Holt ). Hubbard (, p. 1903) notes that only recently have geographers begun to scrutinize the ways in which city‐campus relationships tie in to wider “social, economic, and cultural geographies of urban transformation,” implying that students are agents of social and spatial change.…”
Section: Studentification: “Student Bubbles” and Their Urban Implicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between students and their “host community” is complex, and it is increasingly recognized that studentification may take different forms depending on various factors (Munro and Livingston ; Nakazawa ; Sage et al. ).…”
Section: Studentification: “Student Bubbles” and Their Urban Implicatmentioning
confidence: 99%